Feel free to correct my numbers.......but there are 317 D-1 schools right? Times two would be 634...correct? So if there are 500 transfers from said schools over a two year period....that's less than 1 transfer per school....per year, correct? So what is this "transfer epidemic" that JP and his "peers" are puzzled by? And why should what happens ANYWHERE else dictate his decisions here?
I think you are on the right track here. After a little quick research, there are currently 347 division 1 bball programs. So the epidemic has been 500 transfers over two years. ISU has had what, 7 in the last 2 years? And we may not be done yet.
D1 average = 0.72 transfers per year per team
ISU average = 3.5 per year
We are nearly 5X the national average. If transfers nationwide at an average of 0.72 is an epademic, then ISU is at complete armageddon! I agree with his points about youth these days, but what we are seeing is far from the norm. We aren't just seeing bench players, we are seeing starters leave. And when you look at the reasons given, they just don't pass the smell test.
-Ham wanted to be closer to home, he found that 500 miles farther away at LSU.
-Lucca had a great chance to go pro. He found that with a team that wasn't expecting him until after the season, and his great opportunity is now averaging less than a minute per game
-Brackins decided it was time to leave early to join the NBA. He is projected as a second round pick. How many people jumped early this year that are projected that low in the draft?
-Colvin decided the system didn't fit him. Of course he joined the team in the 4th year under GMac, and we have played the same system the whole time. I guess he didn't bother to watch how we played before he signed
-Buckley wanted more PT. I guess this makes sense. Though if he really couldn't get on the court much when we were starting an average guard with a severe case of mono, then he must have been a huge recruiting bust.
I won't even bother to go into the guys we lost in previous years, as this is more than enough to drive home the point. If we were just looking at one or two of these kids, sure, it is just the way the game is now. But looking at the big picture, and all of the facts, I don't see any way you can come to a conclusion other than to blame the staff. Heck, Pollard's own letter even indicates that part of the reason for the assistant coaching changes is to address this issue. Unfortunately, I think there is someone even bigger than the assistants that is part of this problem, and it seems for some reason we can't clean house there yet.