• Fanatics -

    Thank you for your patience today and welcome to the newest version of Cyclone Fanatic!

    Most of the changes we have made are very simple, but will greatly improve your user experience while visiting the website.

    We have upgraded our forum software to speed things up. Our homepage is much cleaner and should be even more mobile friendly than before.

    We appreciate your loyalty and are committed to not only keeping Cyclone Fanatic in tip-top shape, but continuing to build this community for the next decade and beyond.

    We ask that if you are experiences any glitches to let us know in this thread . Will will be diligently working on the site all day.

    Thanks again.

    Chris Williams - Publisher
C
Reaction score
6,133

Joined
Last seen

Profile posts Latest activity Postings About

  • So are you saying 78 positive cases or 78 deaths from 30,000 in attendance? I don't want to derail the actual thread. Just wanting clarification on what you are saying.

    Thanks,
    TruClone
    C
    Clonehomer
    78 deaths assuming the 0.28% number they posted held true and everyone were exposed (which is the extreme example).
    TruClone
    TruClone
    That would definitely be very extreme. The population of Iowa is 3.155 million, so if you used that same figure the death total would be 8,203. We are nowhere near that kind of number. As of yesterday the death total was 461, so if we applied the number of deaths to the population the number for 30,000 would be 4.38 deaths.
  • Loading…
  • Loading…
  • Loading…