She's pushing 90. I think if she drives anywhere it's to the Elk's LodgeThat is exactly the kind of interchange they’re going to put in at Wright Brothers and I380.
She's pushing 90. I think if she drives anywhere it's to the Elk's LodgeThat is exactly the kind of interchange they’re going to put in at Wright Brothers and I380.
Yeah, getting caught on camera doesn't count! How do cameras even work? Is there a little guy inside it that's drawing what he sees or something?Do you work for a speed camera company?
You missed the point. It doesn't matter if I know who was driving my car, the entity that issues the ticket doesn't.
I speed all the time and I know that if I get caught that I will get a fine and pay it. Key phrase being if I get caught. A camera accusing someone of something they may or may not have done isn't getting caught. Fortunately, I live in a state that still has a shred of common sense and the slightest idea of people's fundamental rights as US citizens.
This Kentucky footage from a brand-new roundabout is really quite the video. Some of these yahoos just move over to the left to take the short way to their turn, completely disregarding any other traffic.Occasionally I almost get hit from someone that slams through while I'm in but figure they either don't read signs or just think they can drive how they want and it's my fault for being in the RAB first.
I've seen a few go the wrong way in them which is entertaining.
My post was in reference to traffic cameras. I really don't see any issues with roundaboutsThere are a ton of studies showing that roundabouts are safer. What are you talking about?
Other than the man trying to tell me which direction I can and can't drive my own car, obviously.My post was in reference to traffic cameras. I really don't see any issues with roundabouts
My mistake, I agree on the camerasMy post was in reference to traffic cameras. I really don't see any issues with roundabouts
BTW, even the city of Cedar Rapids doesn't request tax withholdings anymore...
Cedar Rapids ends controversial traffic camera collection effort
CEDAR RAPIDS – Cedar Rapids quietly discontinued a controversial collection initiative in which people owing money for unpaid automated traffic …www.thegazette.com
On the photos from speed cameras that I have seen, the picture is of the back end of the vehicle, basically focused on the license plate. There is no way to tell who the operator of the vehicle is. Maybe if it's a convertible, you might recognize the back of the drivers head, but otherwise you can't even see the driver.Yeah, getting caught on camera doesn't count! How do cameras even work? Is there a little guy inside it that's drawing what he sees or something?
Yes, there are a lot of aspects about roundabouts that are safer. Hoewever, they do introduce some additional hazards.There are a ton of studies showing that roundabouts are safer. What are you talking about?
ExactlyOther than the man trying to tell me which direction I can and can't drive my own car, obviously.
I'm down. man. No parking tickets will make it much easier next time I go to the farmer's market, just ditching that thing in the middle of the road and walking away to get in line for my giant breakfast burrito.On the photos from speed cameras that I have seen, the picture is of the back end of the vehicle, basically focused on the license plate. There is no way to tell who the operator of the vehicle is. Maybe if it's a convertible, you might recognize the back of the drivers head, but otherwise you can't even see the driver.
Why does a town of a population of around 1400 in the middle of nowhere Iowa even need traffic cameras. Pure money grab it sounds like to me. I'm anti-traffic camera in general as they can say all they want to justify them as safety measures but we all know the real truth that it is easy revenue generators. And for the record I've never received a red light or speed camera ticket in my life so this isn't me bitter about getting a ticket before, I've always felt this way about ticket cameras.
That is exactly the kind of interchange they’re going to put in at Wright Brothers and I380.
Why does a town of a population of around 1400 in the middle of nowhere Iowa even need traffic cameras. Pure money grab it sounds like to me. I'm anti-traffic camera in general as they can say all they want to justify them as safety measures but we all know the real truth that it is easy revenue generators. And for the record I've never received a red light or speed camera ticket in my life so this isn't me bitter about getting a ticket before, I've always felt this way about ticket cameras.
It's the small towns with highways going through them that probably need them the most. People just don't slow down when going through the town. And often those highways are effectively residential streets with houses and businesses lining them.
At least on the interstates, you're just dealing with other cars and the speed difference between them.
Maybe the cameras are a more economically viable option than having a police force of their own strong enough to enforce the speed limits especially considering cuts to state and county funding that could be used for the sheriff's and state patrol to help enforce it.
Not saying it is a money grab but they are cheaper than an officer and patrol car. This was one of the arguments for them that I think is quite valid in CR. Speed has mildly slowed down in CR and officers are freed up to do actual patrolling and taking calls. Not to mention the state patrol and sheriff's office are non-existent in CR so it leaves it on the city to handle.
@3TrueFans : You reacted with Funny. Am I misunderstanding? Is this not what you are suggesting be done?If a driver is operating a vehicle recklessly, speeding or otherwise, give him or her a ticket. No issue with that.
If we want to charge the owner of an inanimate object for the crimes someone else commits while in possession of that object, then the discussion changes.