Ah. So we see the problem. Poor reading comprehemsion skills.
Among them the fact that you mistake "stud or major contributor" for "immediate stud or major contributor".
In football last year, I said that I liked Sed Johnson out of that class, and the likes of Scott Haughton and Chase Harper were just as good, despite their lack of stars.
I still like Sed Johnson, thought he showed a lot of promise, Harper didn't manage to qualify--and Haughton was starting by the end of the year. Plus, Darius Darks, whom I had liked as a safety, did just as well when insisting upon playing offense. And while I liked Ter'ran Benton, in the face of rampant optimism I was also uncertain about Jeremiah Schwartz due to a published (scouting combine) 4.89 40 time.
Anything else you--inadvertantly misread, I'm sure--is in error. There wasn't a single member of last year's basketball class that I touted, indeed, I attempted to temper expectations over Wes Eikmeier. I was hesitantly optimistic about Justin Hamilton, in the long run (who pleasantly surprised), and all I ever said about Buckley was that the staff thought he fit their system. That Pomlee was an excellent athlete, but raw. And I refrained comment about Mann.
So while you ponder your own lack of reading comprehension, I'll wonder (albeit briefly), whether you're just that dense, or merely being a jerk. But I figure it really doesn't matter, either way. And I'll go my own way, leave the playing field to you, and wish you (and all others) a good and happy Sunday! :biggrin:
Go Cyclones!