Who do the Fans want as Starting QB?
- Thread starter BloodyBuddy
- Start date
Ruxy....Not to bash anyone, but, steele must have gotten hurt against UNI then....after all he was below 50% on the day, and finished with under 200 yards passing with 40 attempts and also made the decision that he would run the ball 20 times. That means he put the ball in his own hands 60 times....you can speculate as well as me on that quantity of touches....
But, he had 3 interceptions in those attempts, which, for the season, was about right around his average. I really liked Jantz when he would make his reads and not force it. Problem is, a player with his flare, always thinks they can make the play - even if it is a huge risk. Those risks in football usually equal points!!!!!
I only hope one of the two have matured into the position - if that happens we will be fine, both have all the tools to be not only good, but, very good/great in this scheme.
Good Luck guys.
Too many questions surface for me when asking this question. A. Is one more year in the offense enough to improve the decision making of SJ? B. Is one more year of hitting the weights helping with JBs arm strength? C. Has Mess helped out SJ or JB more with mechanics issues related to inaccuracy? D. Has the O-line become better at facing the blitz, therein creating more time for the QB and potentially leading to fewer TOs? E. Will the simplified playbook help the gunslinger SJ who is prone to TO due to decision making mistakes or the heady JB who lacks physical attributes needed to make all the throws?
So,
1. If A>B then SJ.
2. If B>A then JB.
If yes to D then refer to 1 and 2 but take into account JBs pocket presense being > SJs. Therefore improved line play may help SJ more.
IF C is equal for both JB and SJ then it can be eliminated. If improvement is seen that is greater for either party then they hold the advantage and you may refer again to 1 and 2.
My answer to E would be SJ.
This information may add the theory of improvement, which may lead us to answer one being more true than 2, and as was proven above if A>B then go with Jantz.
So.. there you go
So,
1. If A>B then SJ.
2. If B>A then JB.
If yes to D then refer to 1 and 2 but take into account JBs pocket presense being > SJs. Therefore improved line play may help SJ more.
IF C is equal for both JB and SJ then it can be eliminated. If improvement is seen that is greater for either party then they hold the advantage and you may refer again to 1 and 2.
My answer to E would be SJ.
This information may add the theory of improvement, which may lead us to answer one being more true than 2, and as was proven above if A>B then go with Jantz.
So.. there you go
CycloneErik
Well-Known Member
You didn't carry the 1.Too many questions surface for me when asking this question. A. Is one more year in the offense enough to improve the decision making of SJ? B. Is one more year of hitting the weights helping with JBs arm strength? C. Has Mess helped out SJ or JB more with mechanics issues related to inaccuracy? D. Has the O-line become better at facing the blitz, therein creating more time for the QB and potentially leading to fewer TOs? E. Will the simplified playbook help the gunslinger SJ who is prone to TO due to decision making mistakes or the heady JB who lacks physical attributes needed to make all the throws?
So,
1. If A>B then SJ.
2. If B>A then JB.
If yes to D then refer to 1 and 2 but take into account JBs pocket presense being > SJs. Therefore improved line play may help SJ more.
IF C is equal for both JB and SJ then it can be eliminated. If improvement is seen that is greater for either party then they hold the advantage and you may refer again to 1 and 2.
My answer to E would be SJ.
This information may add the theory of improvement, which may lead us to answer one being more true than 2, and as was proven above if A>B then go with Jantz.
So.. there you go
I prefer Barnett but I like Steele too. Honestly, neither one has proven to be particularly great so I'm not worried about the QB thing this time around. They are so even overall that it won't matter much who starts and who doesn't. I look for both guys to play in the fall.
Whatever happens, I hope eventually we pick 1 guy and stick with him. I can't stand the musical chairs at QB.
Whatever happens, I hope eventually we pick 1 guy and stick with him. I can't stand the musical chairs at QB.
exactly, I was thinking of some wicked formations where he passes with his foot.
I also nominate Theo Walcott for punt returner.
Too many questions surface for me when asking this question. A. Is one more year in the offense enough to improve the decision making of SJ? B. Is one more year of hitting the weights helping with JBs arm strength? C. Has Mess helped out SJ or JB more with mechanics issues related to inaccuracy? D. Has the O-line become better at facing the blitz, therein creating more time for the QB and potentially leading to fewer TOs? E. Will the simplified playbook help the gunslinger SJ who is prone to TO due to decision making mistakes or the heady JB who lacks physical attributes needed to make all the throws?
So,
1. If A>B then SJ.
2. If B>A then JB.
If yes to D then refer to 1 and 2 but take into account JBs pocket presense being > SJs. Therefore improved line play may help SJ more.
IF C is equal for both JB and SJ then it can be eliminated. If improvement is seen that is greater for either party then they hold the advantage and you may refer again to 1 and 2.
My answer to E would be SJ.
This information may add the theory of improvement, which may lead us to answer one being more true than 2, and as was proven above if A>B then go with Jantz.
So.. there you go
IT'S SCIENCE!!!!
Jantz, he makes me feel as if we could score at any moment. I truely feel having a half season of D1 under his belt, his nerves should be much better causing less turnovers. I am sure getting benched half a season and watching your treamate shock the world by knocking off the #2 team in the nation has to be a big motivator. Remember, Barnett had an extra year in the system to learn the ropes, now Jantz should be on a more even ground.
To sum up, it's jantz's job to lose as long as he keeps his head on straight. If he is still all over the place, Barnett take it.
To sum up, it's jantz's job to lose as long as he keeps his head on straight. If he is still all over the place, Barnett take it.
I think both jantz and Barnett will improve before fall.
I also think it's highly possible that Jantz will show a lot of the qualities that got him the starting job last fall.
However, the coaches have several examples showing how Jantz performs with the bullets flying and they may take that into account.
I also think it's highly possible that Jantz will show a lot of the qualities that got him the starting job last fall.
However, the coaches have several examples showing how Jantz performs with the bullets flying and they may take that into account.
I think that Austen should play and wear Barnett's jersey and never take his helmet off to hide his identity. Yep, that is what we will do.
I think CW put it best (hey, maybe I'll get a derp too, but I think he nailed it). Jantz is Favre: He can put one in the endzone on any play, and he can put one in the defense's hands on any play. Barnett isn't as flashy, but he's not as likely to make you want to gouge your eyeballs out with a dull soup spoon either.
