During the latter stages of the game a segment was shown and discussed by the broadcasters comparing McD's first 3 years to Johnny Orr's first 3 and the point was emphasized with statistics to clearly show that McD actually has a better winning percentage after 3 years. They went on to say do not forget that Johnny is the winningest coach at ISU.
I don't know for a fact, but I would imagine the SID did feed the information to the announcers. After all, there are plenty of people not very happy with Pollard's hire and the idiotic contract he gave him, so it is CYA time.
It is such a bogus argument though. The records in the first 4 years are Orr 48-63. 18-38 in conference. GMac 47-65 and 16-44 in conference. Part of the reason it is bogus is that teams are now allowed to play 32 games per year outside of the NCAA, NIT, or CBI tourneys. In Orr's time the limit was 28. As far as conference goes, Orr was in the Big 8 with 14 games per year. ISU now plays 16 conference games per year.
But the more telling thing is who Orr played and who GMac has played in non-conference. Here is a partial list of some of the non-conference teams Orr's teams played in the first 4 years alone. The number in parentheses is the number of times those schools were played in the first four years.
Vanderbilt, Creighton (3), Texas (2), TCU, Pittsburgh, Wisconsin, Minnesota (2), Arizona (2), Penn State, Illinois, Boston College, Marquette, Indiana (yes Bobby K's Indiana, at Hilton no less) , Virginia Tech, Washington, Arkansas, Cornell, Ohio State.
Compare that list to the hyphenated schools GMac has played. Orr was able to get these schools scheduled because of his popularity and reputation with the other coaches.
Also, Orr took over a program that was absolutely in the toilet after several years of Ken Trickey and Lynn Nance. GMac did not take over a program that was in nearly the same condition.
Like I said....it is a totally bogus comparison.