I hope he gets caught in that escalator and a bloodbath ensues. All avoidable because a parent, I don't care which one, should have taught him to fear and respect that escalator!
Was just a shooting in WDM...linked to rapist
- Thread starter isuno1fan
- Start date
- Status
I hope he gets caught in that escalator and a bloodbath ensues. All avoidable because a parent, I don't care which one, should have taught him to fear and respect that escalator!
Actually, for the crimes of rape, and home invasion, I believe the "justice system" is insufficient.
But there is not really a good system for dealing with those. Both are such a personal impact issue, where if the bad guy goes to trial, his lawyer puts the victims on trial, and they get victimized twice. To complicate it more, it is also often a subjective crime.
And again, but, what else can we do? I'm a big fan of self-defense, but not a big fan of mob justice or vigilantism. And there is a difference.
But there is not really a good system for dealing with those. Both are such a personal impact issue, where if the bad guy goes to trial, his lawyer puts the victims on trial, and they get victimized twice. To complicate it more, it is also often a subjective crime.
And again, but, what else can we do? I'm a big fan of self-defense, but not a big fan of mob justice or vigilantism. And there is a difference.
Darn it.
I thought I was your favorite.
It must have been my thread about smoking that did me asunder, wasn't it?
Since when does "person of interest" equate to "definitely guilty"?
Good lord, I hope you don't all own torches and pitchforks.
Pulling a weapon is certainly suspicious, and I won't fault the officers for shooting (and killing) the guy, but assuming he was guilty of a crime worthy of the death penalty just because he was a "person of interest" is a pretty huge leap.
Good lord, I hope you don't all own torches and pitchforks.
Pulling a weapon is certainly suspicious, and I won't fault the officers for shooting (and killing) the guy, but assuming he was guilty of a crime worthy of the death penalty just because he was a "person of interest" is a pretty huge leap.
Anyone else notice that Angie's "favorites" are constantly shifting and situationally dependent?
Hmmmm....
I don't know at whom this is directed, but we don't allow name calling or personal attacks on CF. Thank you.
Well said.
Yell armegeddon?
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cTrOb8zyrZk]YouTube - ARMAGEDDON!!! - Radio announcer struggles with funny story![/ame]
Another nice reason for him to be dead...
They can now extract his DNA and don't need a consent to do it.
Seeing how they have DNA from previous crimes, they can hopefully just match it up, close the book on the case and bury this waste of space.
They can now extract his DNA and don't need a consent to do it.
Seeing how they have DNA from previous crimes, they can hopefully just match it up, close the book on the case and bury this waste of space.
Let's all remember this person did not just sexually assault 1 person, but 6. He should have been waterboarded first.
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2fLn9Z1G_LE]YouTube - Cream - I Feel Free (( New STEREO Mix ))[/ame]
I qualify everything I have said with if he is the rapist. And I stand by those comments.
Okay, okay, the illusion is more important than the reality, I get it.
I just saw a British movie where a really hot woman keeps going around and ruining mens' lives by seducing them, convincing them to do drugs and commit crimes.
That just started me thinking: Is Angie CF's "Sister Carrie?"
And that's a determination (well before he died, at any rate) of the criminal justice system, not a bunch of people drawing conclusions from a 50 word article that implies not even a scintilla of evidence that he was guilty of anything other than allegedly brandishing a weapon when questioned by police about a crime that he may or may not have had knowledge about.
That's a far cry from being guilty beyond a shadow of a doubt by a jury of his peers, and then sentenced according to the guidelines for the crimes which he might theoretically have been found guilty of.
It's an internet message board. Much of what is discussed here, sports or otherwise, is based on assumptions.
We're not trying to rewrite the law books here. No one is putting the guy on trial. It's simply, people assuming he is the rapist and glad he's dead.
Count me in.
Even if he is not the rapist, the police likely acted how they should when someone pulls a gun out. Again, assuming that part of the article is correct (I guess we gotta put a disclaimer on everything now).
We're not trying to rewrite the law books here. No one is putting the guy on trial. It's simply, people assuming he is the rapist and glad he's dead.
Count me in.
Even if he is not the rapist, the police likely acted how they should when someone pulls a gun out. Again, assuming that part of the article is correct (I guess we gotta put a disclaimer on everything now).
Not to stick up for the guy, but he only sexually assaulted two people.
Last edited:
- Status
