Yeah Wisconsin usually forces a couple turnovers in this game and I think Iowa is going to have to win the turnover battle in this one to come out on top.Oh, they have a shot for sure, but they will have to play a complete game to do it.
Yeah Wisconsin usually forces a couple turnovers in this game and I think Iowa is going to have to win the turnover battle in this one to come out on top.Oh, they have a shot for sure, but they will have to play a complete game to do it.
Absolutely. Something we can agree on!
Oh, they have a shot for sure, but they will have to play a complete game to do it.
I think we can agree on a lot of things. I think you'd agree most Iowa fans downplay or discredit Purdy's abilities. I mean there are Iowa fans out there that legit think Nate Stanley is a better college quarterback than him
Nate Stanley has sucked before lol.There are actually ISU fans out there that legit think Nate Stanley sucks.
There are actually ISU fans out there that legit think Nate Stanley sucks.
Nate Stanley has sucked before lol.
That's fair.He has had some bad games no doubt and he will probably have another one or two again. He is inconsistent, but I don't think he sucks.
He has had some bad games no doubt and he will probably have another one or two again. He is inconsistent, but I don't think he sucks.
Don't know for sure yet. Justin Fields if we play Ohio St. He's a legit Heisman candidate.
Don't know for sure yet. Right now Wisconsin and Penn St both have QBs with better passer ratings. Right CyTwins?So not anyone on Iowa's schedule.
Purdy has as many completions as both of those guys have attempts. Purdy's also thrown it for over 200 more yards than both of them, and the same amount of TD's. Clifford's % is poor compared to Coan's and Purdy's too. They've all had similar seasons so far but Purdy is probably better all around.Don't know for sure yet. Right now Wisconsin and Penn St both have QBs with better passer ratings. Right CyTwins?
Don't know for sure yet. Right now Wisconsin and Penn St both have QBs with better passer ratings. Right CyTwins?
I think Brock is raw but very talented. You need to do better than 0-3 vs top 60 defenses though to start talking best in the nation lol.
I think it's fair to say he's top 10 though
Stanley has also started what like 29 games? No QB is immune to playing a couple stinkers. Purdy included. Rest assured he will have a couple head scratchers before he's done.Nate Stanley has sucked before lol.
By what standard? Top 10 in ISU history? probably so.
I'm not saying he's not going to play bad because everyone plays bad every once in a while. Stanley has had some terrible games and stat lines though and I don't think Brock will have a game as bad as some of Stanley's.Stanley has also started what like 29 games? No QB is immune to playing a couple stinkers. Purdy included. Rest assured he will have a couple head scratchers before he's done.