*****The Super, Mega, Huge Big 12 Expansion Thread*****

Status
Not open for further replies.

keepngoal

OKA: keepingoal
Staff member
Bookie
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Jun 20, 2006
39,426
24,746
113
There should be NO negotiation. Both teams knew the EXIT Fees when they decided to leave. It is pretty simple. Make out the check.

If the Big 12 for some reason will not be able to get WVU for the coming year and the TV contracts are lowered, is Mizzou prepared to make up the shortfall since it was their leaving that caused the problem?

You have brought up the CU and NU exit fees saying that is what Mizzou should pay. In that case the TV contracts remained the same and the remaining teams actually made more money by those teams leaving. Plus Misery acted like a scumbag in this whole ordeal.

while the bolded part is reality .... them paying full price isn't. There WILL be a negotiated payout.

-keep
 

laxtonto

Member
Dec 16, 2010
84
2
8
46
Denton
I hate to say it, but there will not ever be a N/S alignment again.. I would almost go as far and guarantee that OU and UT will never be on the same side of the conference again if they go to 12.

The weak North is one of the reasons why the old Big 12 blew up. No one wanted to watch the North games (outside of Neb) and the population bases where not engaged in the North games... No Texas or Oklahoma ties killed the value to the networks and lead to the poor payout on the last deal when it was set at 12 teams.
 

jdoggivjc

Well-Known Member
Sep 27, 2006
61,576
23,809
113
Macomb, MI
I hate to say it, but there will not ever be a N/S alignment again.. I would almost go as far and guarantee that OU and UT will never be on the same side of the conference again if they go to 12.

The weak North is one of the reasons why the old Big 12 blew up. No one wanted to watch the North games (outside of Neb) and the population bases where not engaged in the North games... No Texas or Oklahoma ties killed the value to the networks and lead to the poor payout on the last deal when it was set at 12 teams.

I hear this argued both ways. Half the time it's argued the way you put it - plus you would almost always see a Texas v. Oklahoma Big 12 Championship. I also see it argued that Texas and Oklahoma want to be in the same division because the division winner would have a virtual cakewalk to the Big 12 Championship and BCS/National Title game.

What it means is it's all simply pure speculation and nobody knows what the hell is going to happen. The Big 12 may never go back to 12 anyway for all we know.
 

alarson

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 15, 2006
59,264
73,678
113
Ankeny
The problem with the whole 'you need to separate OU\TX' is assuming that because theyve very clearly held the power on the field most of the past 10 years that they will continue to. Things appear to be trending the other direction, with a lot more parity in this league.
 

2020cy

Well-Known Member
Aug 7, 2006
6,337
2,628
113
while the bolded part is reality .... them paying full price isn't. There WILL be a negotiated payout.

-keep
I don't think it's so much of a payout, as it is the Big 12 keeping their pieces of the pie from tv contracts and other revenues this year.
 

clone96cr

Active Member
Apr 11, 2006
145
116
43
Cedar Rapids
I completely agree that we need to get back to a divisional alignment but what I do think will happen is that when we get there, the Big 12 will split UT and OU. I believe that it will follow the B10 model of having a rivalry game that pits each team against one team from the other division each year. To be honest, from a league standpoint this is probably for the best because they will have a chance to have a national title contender most years.

I don't follow your logic. Why would OU and Texas want to be in separate divisions? The Red-River Rivaly won't be going anywhere, so then potentially they'd have to play each other twice. The Big10 will discover their mistake if an undefeated OSU beats an undefeated Mich and then has to play them again the following week and lose to them in the championship game. Then neither team is undefeated and no NC game.
 

alarson

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 15, 2006
59,264
73,678
113
Ankeny
Irony: Big XII playing hardball with A&M/Mizzu and complaining about the Big East plays hardball with WVU.

WVU is leaving a big east that had already lost a ton, both a few years ago and continuing with Syracuse\Pitt (and one other remaining member, Louisville, was openly campaigning for a spot, so if they stayed in the big east theyd likely be facing a BE minus Pitt\Syr\Lville) If mizzou\TAMU were staying we'd still be an extremely strong conference. There's a lot less justification for them to leave the big 12 than there is for WVU to leave the big east.
 

SD4CY

New Member
Nov 21, 2011
9
0
1
Sioux Falls
Irony: Big XII playing hardball with A&M/Mizzu and complaining about the Big East plays hardball with WVU.

Interesting point, but Big XII isn't really playing hardball with the timing of their departure. It is my understanding that the Big East is trying to keep WVU for two years. Thats different then simply trying to get paid.
 

alarson

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 15, 2006
59,264
73,678
113
Ankeny
Interesting point, but Big XII isn't really playing hardball with the timing of their departure. It is my understanding that the Big East is trying to keep WVU for two years. Thats different then simply trying to get paid.

Good point there as well. WVU from day 1 has said they were going to pay the buyout, and i believe already paid part of it.
 

Mizzoulander

Member
Sep 28, 2011
643
16
18
Interesting point, but Big XII isn't really playing hardball with the timing of their departure. It is my understanding that the Big East is trying to keep WVU for two years. Thats different then simply trying to get paid.

That's because the Big East and the Big 12 tried two different methods of coercing teams not to leave the conference. The Big 12 relied on a large withholding of league money, include FUTURE revenues, while the Big East went with a much smaller buyout (like $5M) and a stipulation that any team would have to give 27 months notice to leave. Both were meant to make withdrawing from the conference a more difficult task for dissatisfied schools.

Interestingly enough, neither tactic worked. Both conferences continued to lose schools, and the provisions (big payouts for the Big 12, or long waiting periods for the Big East) have not been fully enforced on any departing team in either conference.

In the end, both conferences will get paid (the Big East can't FORCE WVU to stick around). The only question is how much.
 

Madclone1

Well-Known Member
Oct 21, 2007
2,035
69
48
That's because the Big East and the Big 12 tried two different methods of coercing teams not to leave the conference. The Big 12 relied on a large withholding of league money, include FUTURE revenues, while the Big East went with a much smaller buyout (like $5M) and a stipulation that any team would have to give 27 months notice to leave. Both were meant to make withdrawing from the conference a more difficult task for dissatisfied schools.

Interestingly enough, neither tactic worked. Both conferences continued to lose schools, and the provisions (big payouts for the Big 12, or long waiting periods for the Big East) have not been fully enforced on any departing team in either conference.

In the end, both conferences will get paid (the Big East can't FORCE WVU to stick around). The only question is how much.

With all that good Missouri and ATM money! Thanks!
 

jdoggivjc

Well-Known Member
Sep 27, 2006
61,576
23,809
113
Macomb, MI
That's because the Big East and the Big 12 tried two different methods of coercing teams not to leave the conference. The Big 12 relied on a large withholding of league money, include FUTURE revenues, while the Big East went with a much smaller buyout (like $5M) and a stipulation that any team would have to give 27 months notice to leave. Both were meant to make withdrawing from the conference a more difficult task for dissatisfied schools.

Interestingly enough, neither tactic worked. Both conferences continued to lose schools, and the provisions (big payouts for the Big 12, or long waiting periods for the Big East) have not been fully enforced on any departing team in either conference.

In the end, both conferences will get paid (the Big East can't FORCE WVU to stick around). The only question is how much.

th_81496052.gif
 

Stormin

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
45,455
14,310
113
Nice win by WVU last night. Hope they make the BCS bowl as the Big Least Champion. If Ohio State wins, the Big 12 could be well represented with 2 BCS teams plus future member WVU.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Help Support Us

Become a patron