How does this constitute being a "doer"? I will be doing the exact same thing. This is staying status quo. I asked what does a "doer" do in this situation. Staying the same doesn't constitute being a "doer".
People that are questioning the direction of the program will also continue to support and cheer the team. I question what is happening right now but will still be at games, donating, etc. Does this mean I'm not a "doer"? As I stated in a different thread the group I sit with and tailgate with were people that donated at high levels through the dark years and helped keep things a float and donate at higher levels today. They are all questioning the direction of the program, are they not "doers" or are they just complainers?.
Let's deal with benchmarks. Say we go 0-6 or 1-5. What then? Worry that badmouthing the coach might cost us recruits? This is year 6 people. This is when coaches are supposed to be hitting their stride. CPR did better with Chizik's recruits than his own. How does that support keeping the present course? How do you think Fred will do in year 6 at ISU?
I hope for the best, but deep down I know how this ends. Probably best that it happens sooner rather than later.
I'm don't care what you do. I really don't but if a guy who is a college graduate and can afford tickets decides not to don't expect me to put any effort in listening to your opinion. I don't care that you are an alum. Somebody that doesn't care enough to support the team by investing into it by purchasing tickets I'm not going to take seriously. You've got a million posts on CF so I know I won't stop you I just thought calling someone out for trying to bring perspective and was just tired of all the ******** while not even being a season ticket holder was bush league.
I'll also say this as a fellow father...you are flat out missing the best time in the next 18 years to go to games. Baby's don't have flag football games, soccer games, traveling softball tournaments. It only gets harder from here to get to games...that I'll promise you.
Let's deal with benchmarks. Say we go 0-6 or 1-5. What then? Worry that badmouthing the coach might cost us recruits? This is year 6 people. This is when coaches are supposed to be hitting their stride. CPR did better with Chizik's recruits than his own. How does that support keeping the present course? How do you think Fred will do in year 6 at ISU?
I hope for the best, but deep down I know how this ends. Probably best that it happens sooner rather than later.
People keep saying this like year 6 is supposed to be some magical year when the stars align. Every coach and every program has down cycles. Some may fall lower than others but none are immune.
From what I can tell, Rhoads winning a bowl game is about the equivalent of our basketball coach making the Sweet 16 (3 bowl wins to 4 Sweet 16s). Making a bowl is about the equivalent of making the NCAA tournament (12 vs 15).
So imagine if McDermott made the Sweet 16 his first year and made the NCAA tournament 3 of his first 4 years, I would assume JP would give him a contract extension. If Freddie has two down years, are we going to be calling for his head too?
From what I can tell, Rhoads winning a bowl game is about the equivalent of our basketball coach making the Sweet 16 (3 bowl wins to 4 Sweet 16s). Making a bowl is about the equivalent of making the NCAA tournament (12 vs 15).
So imagine if McDermott made the Sweet 16 his first year and made the NCAA tournament 3 of his first 4 years, I would assume JP would give him a contract extension. If Freddie has two down years, are we going to be calling for his head too?
From what I can tell, Rhoads winning a bowl game is about the equivalent of our basketball coach making the Sweet 16 (3 bowl wins to 4 Sweet 16s). Making a bowl is about the equivalent of making the NCAA tournament (12 vs 15).
So imagine if McDermott made the Sweet 16 his first year and made the NCAA tournament 3 of his first 4 years, I would assume JP would give him a contract extension. If Freddie has two down years, are we going to be calling for his head too?
From what I can tell, Rhoads winning a bowl game is about the equivalent of our basketball coach making the Sweet 16 (3 bowl wins to 4 Sweet 16s). Making a bowl is about the equivalent of making the NCAA tournament (12 vs 15).
So imagine if McDermott made the Sweet 16 his first year and made the NCAA tournament 3 of his first 4 years, I would assume JP would give him a contract extension. If Freddie has two down years, are we going to be calling for his head too?
I'd buy that if Fred got into his 3 NCAA tourneys on .500 records, or if over half the teams made the NCAA tourney.
On that sport's scale, if Fred starts winning 5-8 games a year, we should call for his head. That would be a pathetic record.
Here's the problem though. We haven't "fallen". We aren't "rebuilding". Both those terms suggest we were somewhere elevated. We were "built".
We haven't finished with a winning regular season in 10 years!
In that time, think of the money spent. The facility improvements. Bergstrom first opened in 2004 I believe. The stadium enhancements, the renovations. The Hixson-Lied academic bldg. The Football office complex. Now the endzone has kicked off.
Forever, we've been told that we need these things to be more competitive. If anything, we're less.
Where's the payoff? When is enough, enough? How many chances do people (who are making millions) get? How many times can you push the finish line back? How often do you go to the well with the "we need xxxxx to take the next step".
6 years is a long time - 1 entire redshirt class, 2 4 year classes - to accept what looks to be another losing season and second consecutive beginning with a loss to a team from a division that is supposed to be "below" ours.
(FTR - I'm not advocating CPR be fired midseason at all. I'm going to see how the remaining 11 play out and how things look. But all the bickering and setting the seat on fire is entirely warranted at the current time)
If Fred has a .346 record overall and a .384 conference over the course of 2 seasons, then I would assume we would need to start looking at what he is doing what is going wrong.
That percentage is awful.
Much better than the .208 percentage that Chizik had. And much better than the .250 percentage the 3 years before CPR got here. Fact is that CPR has the best winning percentage of any coach at ISU in the last 30 years.
Much better than the .208 percentage that Chizik had. And much better than the .250 percentage the 3 years before CPR got here. Fact is that CPR has the best winning percentage of any coach at ISU in the last 30 years.
Much better than the .208 percentage that Chizik had. And much better than the .250 percentage the 3 years before CPR got here. Fact is that CPR has the best winning percentage of any coach at ISU in the last 30 years.
That changes in 4 games. Then he's in a dead heat with DMac. If this is a 9-10 loss season, CPR is just another guy that can't get the job done here.
Nice stat, but it won't hold up.