In four years? I realize that Baylor was in a worse place than ISU (as hard as that is to imagine) was when they each took over, but compare Fred's first 4 years to this:
8-21, 3-13, 11th
9-19, 1-15, 12th
4-13, 4-12, 12th (NCAA sanctions, no non-conference play)
15-16, 4-12, 11th
------------------
21-11, 9-7, T-4th, NCAA
24-15, 5-11, 9th, NIT
Even though Baylor was worse to start with, I don't think you can say that even Drew's first 6 years were head and shoulders above what Fred has done in his first 4.
Fred has to make more than $1.2 million, right? Didn't we give him a raise to something like $2 million?
I'm sticking with the Johnny Orr Court in Hoiberg Coliseum at the Hilton Center.
I am wondering if his contract has incentives for NCAA appearances, Big 12 titles, Sweet 16, etc... if not it should have! Reward him for an amazing job and he's just starting!
That said I don't think you can put a price tag on Fred's love for ISU, Ames and the community. Such an amazing story...
The biggest mistake ISU could make is to fail to recognize the return on investment that Fred presents. Put together a cost benefit analysis and pay Fred accordingly.
Why does everybody think that Fred is unhappy with how much he is being paid?
Ok, let's base it on what Scott Drew has done at Baylor. That's a more likely comparison.
I'm glad you aren't our AD. You probably wanted a lifetime contract and top in the Big 12 for Rhoads after his first couple of years too.
What would you have given Scott Drew? $5 mil per year for 10 years? Like it or not, he has done a much better job at Baylor so far than Fred has at Iowa State.
I love Hoiberg but let's not get carried away because we made it to one sweet 16.
I know it is difficult to quantify the financial benefit that ISU's basketball success has on the universities revenues, but I have not doubt that the free advertising that our basketball success is generating can more then justify paying Fred $3 million per season.
We need to get Fred to at least that level if not higher. Now is not the time to be frugal. Fred has the potential to make ISU a national brand on par with North Carolina and Kansas. That leads to increased enrollment, attendance, ticket prices, tuition fees, licensing fees, etc. Furthermore, realignment is far from over, so you can't underestimate the significance of making ISU as valuable a brand as possible.
The biggest mistake ISU could make is to fail to recognize the return on investment that Fred presents. Put together a cost benefit analysis and pay Fred accordingly.
No disrespect but Lon and Ford have no business being paid more.
I don't think anyone is. This thread is simply a fear reaction that we could lose him if we don't appreciate him. The administration needs to reflect what the fans know. There is no other coach for us.
Time to create a dynasty people. Dynasties take time and money.
Somebody else will take your spot. Good for ISU. It's the price of success.I hope not. I'd probably be out.
[video=youtube;1jUBbCgMWmE]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1jUBbCgMWmE[/video]
What ISU does give is guaranteed money. We won't be firing him in the next 10 years. So that's 20+ million guaranteed.
In the NBA you get a shorter contract, less power, and you are extremely disposable.
That's what ISU has as an advantage.