No TV or Internet Broadcast for Texas game

CycloneErik

Well-Known Member
Jan 31, 2008
108,166
53,419
113
Jamerica
rememberingdoria.wordpress.com
Funny thing about this thread is that it turned into a little fight that never needed to happen. Something we're already discussing in another thread, and something that really wasn't worth fighting about, anyway.

I don't like it. I hope someone puts this up on the Internet.

I miss the old days, when it seemed like everything was on TV.
 

RayShimley

Well-Known Member
Sep 9, 2008
6,298
344
83
42
White Bear Lake, MN
Funny thing about this thread is that it turned into a little fight that never needed to happen. Something we're already discussing in another thread, and something that really wasn't worth fighting about, anyway.

I don't like it. I hope someone puts this up on the Internet.

I miss the old days, when ISU had its own television station.

FIFY.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CycloneErik

Clonehomer

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
26,880
25,017
113
Has nothing to do with the LHN.

Unless you believe in conspiracy theories. Since ESPN runs both the Big12 and LHN, it wouldn't be that far of a stretch to say that they decided they wanted this game on LHN instead of the Big12 network in order to pressure providers.
 

chuckd4735

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 29, 2006
29,602
12,049
113
42
Lee's Summit, MO
Also, the fact this game was not selected to be shown nationally or by the Big 12 Television Network as one of its games of the week has a lot to do with the politics of the LHN having to get as much content as possible in an attempt to pressure cable companies to carry their network.

I also agree with your assessment that there are plenty of idiots on this site.

Outside of Saturday, the Big 12 Network only does 1 game a week, and this week they chose Baylor at OU. Now why it did not get picked up by any of the ESPN networks may be because of the LHN politics, but you don't know that. It is quite obvious what ESPN is doing with the LHN in locking this thing down to force subscriptions. I still don't get their business model at all...its like they are trying to do the same thing the Big 10 Network did, and for some reason they think it will work.
 

VeloClone

Well-Known Member
Jan 19, 2010
48,484
39,294
113
Brooklyn Park, MN
Unless you believe in conspiracy theories. Since ESPN runs both the Big12 and LHN, it wouldn't be that far of a stretch to say that they decided they wanted this game on LHN instead of the Big12 network in order to pressure providers.

I might normally have an inclination to agree with you, but wasn't this decision made (game on LHN) some time ago when ISU was struggling. It wouldn't have been much of a marquee matchup to provide much pressure.
 
Last edited:

alarson

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 15, 2006
59,589
74,409
113
Ankeny
Unless you believe in conspiracy theories. Since ESPN runs both the Big12 and LHN, it wouldn't be that far of a stretch to say that they decided they wanted this game on LHN instead of the Big12 network in order to pressure providers.

Our game would be a pretty crappy game to use to pressure providers. You will never see LHN carriage in iowa (the satellites arent going to pick it up), and probably not outside of texas. If they wanted to pressure providers games vs TAMU, Tech, and Baylor wouldve been the ones to go with, since their first priority should be getting coverage in their own state.

I have to ask though, for those that say 'dont blame the LHN'... they could have allowed a local provider like mediacom to simulcast the LHN broadcast on MC22. It didnt have to be an all or nothing 'ISU sends a truck or gets no TV'... also, if it werent for the LHN's issues getting carriage, they probably would have the game up on ESPN3 like most other games that are on espn properties.
 

mt85

Well-Known Member
Mar 24, 2006
2,467
129
63
Outside of Saturday, the Big 12 Network only does 1 game a week, and this week they chose Baylor at OU. Now why it did not get picked up by any of the ESPN networks may be because of the LHN politics, but you don't know that. It is quite obvious what ESPN is doing with the LHN in locking this thing down to force subscriptions. I still don't get their business model at all...its like they are trying to do the same thing the Big 10 Network did, and for some reason they think it will work.

We really have some limited thinkers on this site. Here is a clue for you.

How many of this years conference games won't be available on TV in Iowa?
 

VeloClone

Well-Known Member
Jan 19, 2010
48,484
39,294
113
Brooklyn Park, MN
I have to ask though, for those that say 'dont blame the LHN'... they could have allowed a local provider like mediacom to simulcast the LHN broadcast on MC22. It didnt have to be an all or nothing 'ISU sends a truck or gets no TV'... also, if it werent for the LHN's issues getting carriage, they probably would have the game up on ESPN3 like most other games that are on espn properties.

I agree with this. At least some of us probably would have been able to see it somewhere if it wasn't LHN.
 

RayShimley

Well-Known Member
Sep 9, 2008
6,298
344
83
42
White Bear Lake, MN
Our game would be a pretty crappy game to use to pressure providers. You will never see LHN carriage in iowa (the satellites arent going to pick it up), and probably not outside of texas. If they wanted to pressure providers games vs TAMU, Tech, and Baylor wouldve been the ones to go with, since their first priority should be getting coverage in their own state.

I have to ask though, for those that say 'dont blame the LHN'... they could have allowed a local provider like mediacom to simulcast the LHN broadcast on MC22. It didnt have to be an all or nothing 'ISU sends a truck or gets no TV'... also, if it werent for the LHN's issues getting carriage, they probably would have the game up on ESPN3 like most other games that are on espn properties.

That's a lot of "probablys" and "could haves". Bottom line is that we could have had this game on TV if ISU thought it was a worthwhile investment. If this team continues to improve and gain more national recognition I'm guessing that balance will fall more in the favor of sending a crew in these situations for the future.
 

mt85

Well-Known Member
Mar 24, 2006
2,467
129
63
Our game would be a pretty crappy game to use to pressure providers. You will never see LHN carriage in iowa (the satellites arent going to pick it up), and probably not outside of texas. If they wanted to pressure providers games vs TAMU, Tech, and Baylor wouldve been the ones to go with, since their first priority should be getting coverage in their own state.

I have to ask though, for those that say 'dont blame the LHN'... they could have allowed a local provider like mediacom to simulcast the LHN broadcast on MC22. It didnt have to be an all or nothing 'ISU sends a truck or gets no TV'... also, if it werent for the LHN's issues getting carriage, they probably would have the game up on ESPN3 like most other games that are on espn properties.

Getting content on the LHN has nothing to do with getting cable providers in Iowa to carry the LHN. It has to do with pressuring Texas cable providers to carry the network. smh
 

HFCS

Well-Known Member
Aug 13, 2010
75,859
66,300
113
LA LA Land
Outside of Saturday, the Big 12 Network only does 1 game a week, and this week they chose Baylor at OU. Now why it did not get picked up by any of the ESPN networks may be because of the LHN politics, but you don't know that. It is quite obvious what ESPN is doing with the LHN in locking this thing down to force subscriptions. I still don't get their business model at all...its like they are trying to do the same thing the Big 10 Network did, and for some reason they think it will work.

If they could get Big 12 football on there consistently it has a chance. They are reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeally overestimating the interest in college basketball by anybody in the state of Texas.

In terms of basketball leverage, the only passion is only going to be from ISU, KSU and WVU, not from UT. They wouldn't dare have a KU Big 12 game go televised only on a Verizon tv service nobody has.

Texas fans, UT and all other Texas schools, don't give a flying crap about hoops even when their teams are great.
 

chuckd4735

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 29, 2006
29,602
12,049
113
42
Lee's Summit, MO
We really have some limited thinkers on this site. Here is a clue for you.

How many of this years conference games won't be available on TV in Iowa?

This is the only one, and its because the game fell all the way to tier 3, and ISU cant afford to do their own broadcast. This SAME thing happened in every game we played at Colorado during the week for the past few years. The difference in those games was, it was available on Full Court. I am agreeing with you on the suckitude of the LHN, but its not the sole reason this game wont be on TV.
 

mt85

Well-Known Member
Mar 24, 2006
2,467
129
63
This is the only one, and it because the game feel all the way to tier 3, and ISU cant afford to do their own broadcast. This SAME thing happened in every game we played at Colorado during the week for the past few years. The difference in those games was, it was available on Full Court. I am agreeing with you on the suckitude of the LHN, but its not the sole reason this game wont be on TV.

How many ISU/Texas games haven't been broadcast in the past? I can't remember any, but I may be wrong. If this truly is the first then how can people conclude this is not due to the LHN?

As to Colorado, I believe the home team has control if it falls to third tier, and I seem to recall that they denied us the ability to broadcast the games.
 

alarson

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 15, 2006
59,589
74,409
113
Ankeny
Getting content on the LHN has nothing to do with getting cable providers in Iowa to carry the LHN. It has to do with pressuring Texas cable providers to carry the network. smh

And using ISU to try to pressure texas providers is also a pretty dumb move. The level of care about this game, especially when it was scheduled, was about zero down there. Basketball in general isnt going to do a lot to pressure texas providers.
 

DeereClone

Well-Known Member
Nov 16, 2009
8,281
9,648
113
Does anyone know how much the athletic department would have lost by sending a crew?

Just curious, TIA