Funny thing about this thread is that it turned into a little fight that never needed to happen. Something we're already discussing in another thread, and something that really wasn't worth fighting about, anyway.
I don't like it. I hope someone puts this up on the Internet.
I miss the old days, when ISU had its own television station.
Has nothing to do with the LHN.
Also, the fact this game was not selected to be shown nationally or by the Big 12 Television Network as one of its games of the week has a lot to do with the politics of the LHN having to get as much content as possible in an attempt to pressure cable companies to carry their network.
I also agree with your assessment that there are plenty of idiots on this site.
Unless you believe in conspiracy theories. Since ESPN runs both the Big12 and LHN, it wouldn't be that far of a stretch to say that they decided they wanted this game on LHN instead of the Big12 network in order to pressure providers.
Unless you believe in conspiracy theories. Since ESPN runs both the Big12 and LHN, it wouldn't be that far of a stretch to say that they decided they wanted this game on LHN instead of the Big12 network in order to pressure providers.
Outside of Saturday, the Big 12 Network only does 1 game a week, and this week they chose Baylor at OU. Now why it did not get picked up by any of the ESPN networks may be because of the LHN politics, but you don't know that. It is quite obvious what ESPN is doing with the LHN in locking this thing down to force subscriptions. I still don't get their business model at all...its like they are trying to do the same thing the Big 10 Network did, and for some reason they think it will work.
I have to ask though, for those that say 'dont blame the LHN'... they could have allowed a local provider like mediacom to simulcast the LHN broadcast on MC22. It didnt have to be an all or nothing 'ISU sends a truck or gets no TV'... also, if it werent for the LHN's issues getting carriage, they probably would have the game up on ESPN3 like most other games that are on espn properties.
Our game would be a pretty crappy game to use to pressure providers. You will never see LHN carriage in iowa (the satellites arent going to pick it up), and probably not outside of texas. If they wanted to pressure providers games vs TAMU, Tech, and Baylor wouldve been the ones to go with, since their first priority should be getting coverage in their own state.
I have to ask though, for those that say 'dont blame the LHN'... they could have allowed a local provider like mediacom to simulcast the LHN broadcast on MC22. It didnt have to be an all or nothing 'ISU sends a truck or gets no TV'... also, if it werent for the LHN's issues getting carriage, they probably would have the game up on ESPN3 like most other games that are on espn properties.
Our game would be a pretty crappy game to use to pressure providers. You will never see LHN carriage in iowa (the satellites arent going to pick it up), and probably not outside of texas. If they wanted to pressure providers games vs TAMU, Tech, and Baylor wouldve been the ones to go with, since their first priority should be getting coverage in their own state.
I have to ask though, for those that say 'dont blame the LHN'... they could have allowed a local provider like mediacom to simulcast the LHN broadcast on MC22. It didnt have to be an all or nothing 'ISU sends a truck or gets no TV'... also, if it werent for the LHN's issues getting carriage, they probably would have the game up on ESPN3 like most other games that are on espn properties.
Outside of Saturday, the Big 12 Network only does 1 game a week, and this week they chose Baylor at OU. Now why it did not get picked up by any of the ESPN networks may be because of the LHN politics, but you don't know that. It is quite obvious what ESPN is doing with the LHN in locking this thing down to force subscriptions. I still don't get their business model at all...its like they are trying to do the same thing the Big 10 Network did, and for some reason they think it will work.
We really have some limited thinkers on this site. Here is a clue for you.
How many of this years conference games won't be available on TV in Iowa?
This is the only one, and it because the game feel all the way to tier 3, and ISU cant afford to do their own broadcast. This SAME thing happened in every game we played at Colorado during the week for the past few years. The difference in those games was, it was available on Full Court. I am agreeing with you on the suckitude of the LHN, but its not the sole reason this game wont be on TV.
He's not your guy, friend!Calm down guy.
Getting content on the LHN has nothing to do with getting cable providers in Iowa to carry the LHN. It has to do with pressuring Texas cable providers to carry the network. smh