- Aug 22, 2011
Its not controversial, but acting like its going to solve anything for the budget and using it to criticize the athletic department is silly. The collective opinion was moving towards "This is so simple, how could they not have done this?!" How do you even know they didn't consider it?I mean, charity would've been cool too, I dig it. Again, it's not gonna fill a stadium or fix all the issues, but it still would've generated some money when we're now in a situation where $0 is being generated.
Why is this point so controversial? It seems both lukewarm and relatively-attainable. Something that probably could've been considered.