I'm failing to see where the outrage is with all of this? It was an opinion piece brought about by something brought to his attention. In no way did it ever act, or try to act, as a journalistic piece. I didn't see him accusing anybody of anything. Only recounting what was said in the letter.
I will say, I had Haws for an ethics of journalism class and he was very passionate about the treatment of the media with rape or potential rape victims and the implications that treatment could have on future cases, so the last couple of lines that he threw in don't surprise me at all.