This is short sighted IMO. In an effort to minimize the impact you have to consider the situation as a whole. For example people keep pointing to New Zealand as a great response. Yeah they’ve killed it there but now they are extremely at risk for a second wave unless they stay isolated as a country until there is a vaccine. The optimal solution outside of a vaccine or treatment coming out is to plateau a bit below your resources. That allows you to treat everyone with the best possible care and limits any potential economic harm.
I think this is very incorrect.
What you said is the 'optimal' approach if the virus is already established widely in your country. Then you are stuck with what you've got and have to try to keep it below resource capacity.
But if you can, the NZ or SK approach is much better. Testing and contact tracing can limit the virus and then once you are on top of it - you keep at testing and contact tracing. You can keep it down that way - especially if you're an island and can easily test anyone coming into your country.