Another Female Teacher 'Incident'
- Thread starter snowcraig2.0
- Start date
Ok, lol.
1. This thread pretty much shows otherwise.
2. Now they are likely to be more desperate. They are very limited on places to live, job prospects, etc. It's not like any of these women were violent offenders.
3. YIKES, this is garbage Statist bologna. Governments have committed most of the most evil deeds ever seen on Earth.
4. She most certainly will be on the list. see #2
5. do you really think the kids care that her life is now ruined? I doubt it.
6. You have most certainly made life worse for her 4 kids.
Artificial age constructs are an absolute necessity for rule of law. Can you imagine the strain on law enforcement and the judicial system if everything was taken by a case-by-case basis. If every accident someone was in you had to establish competency to drive? Can you imagine parents letting their 10 year old kids get drunk and claiming they weren't negligent parents because they are super mature 10 year olds? You literally would have nothing but civil and criminal legal actions trying to establish competency in all kinds of matters.
To me, the answer lies in prosecutorial discretion. To me, it's not hard to sniff out predatory behavior from stupidity. A teacher having consensual sex with a 17 year old a few months away from being 18? Illegal, sure, but give her probation, take away her teaching license, etc. A teacher having sex with a 14 year old, now that's a problem. Clear lack of ability to consent. To me, keep it illegal and let the prosecutors and/or judges sort out the severity of the offense.
Cry me a river government Just Us system. I have no faith in the government paid prosecutors, judges, etc. They only want more laws with which to prosecute people. A little common sense and a few questions of the victims is all that is needed. Round up a small committee and let them ask questions of the victims.
Sure there are differences between 14 years old and 17 but we don't need to ruin lives over consensual acts. What about 14 year olds having sex with each other? Or 14-16. I mean it just gets a bit crazy trying to mandate what people can do with their bodies.
It is very similar to the Republicans and the War on Drugs. I don't want to mandate what substance people can put in their bodies any more than I want to mandate with whom they want to have sex.
Sure there are differences between 14 years old and 17 but we don't need to ruin lives over consensual acts. What about 14 year olds having sex with each other? Or 14-16. I mean it just gets a bit crazy trying to mandate what people can do with their bodies.
It is very similar to the Republicans and the War on Drugs. I don't want to mandate what substance people can put in their bodies any more than I want to mandate with whom they want to have sex.
Argent stop being so ******* creepy all the time.
14 is too young?
Jon Snow went to the Wall when he was 14 and killed white walkers for craps sake.
These kids should know not to bang ugly teachers.
Jon Snow went to the Wall when he was 14 and killed white walkers for craps sake.
These kids should know not to bang ugly teachers.
Wow...
Ok, so explain to me this hypothetical. 45 year old guy meets 14 year old girl. He decides she seems mature enough and the law says this is to be determined on a case by case basis. Is it up to the judgement of this creeper that he isn't breaking the law by having sex, and it should be decided after the fact and the damage has been done whether or not a law is broken? You honestly can't see how this doesn't work in any way whatsoever?
Maybe it should be like driving. You go in and take a test to prove you are capable of consent and get your sex license. Then the creep could ask for the 14 year olds sex license. Of course you dont want that because its more bureaucracy, but its the only way what you are proposing might work.
And Argent has children, let that little nugget sit in your brain for a minute and see if you don't throw up.
Only if the 14 year old is still in third grade. I sense a redneck joke coming on...
So what you are saying is we get a group of people together, let's just call it for the sake of argument a "jury of your peers". We then allow them to hear evidence, including the statements of the alleged victim, and that group of people gets to make a determination of whether a crime was committed? Sounds like a great system to me.
Here we go again....
https://hudsonvalleynewsnetwork.com...acher-admits-to-having-oral-sex-with-student/
https://hudsonvalleynewsnetwork.com...acher-admits-to-having-oral-sex-with-student/
High five, kid.
How does this conversation go:
"I need help with my social studies homework."
"Here, I bet you think better with your pants on the floor over there."
Man, when will these adolescent boys learn to keep their ****ing mouths shut?!?
Hard not to brag of course.
