and that is a bad thing.
I think I am going to really hate the rule change regarding the clock by the end of the year.
I think I am going to really hate the rule change regarding the clock by the end of the year.
No way we ran 100 plays. I thought the game flowed a lot better, kept the action moving, and only sacrificed about 10ish plays.I completely agree, Jon. Didn't ISU run around 100 plays against Nebraska? I'm not for extending games pointlessly, but I certainly don't want to speed it up pointlessly either.
actually 100 isnt that far off. if it was not 100 it was 90+. i will look for the statNo way we ran 100 plays. I thought the game flowed a lot better, kept the action moving, and only sacrificed about 10ish plays.
Not the first, won't be the last:wink:I stand corrected.
You haven't seen the last of me!Not the first, won't be the last:wink:
Yeah.. I half expected to have just gotten home.Total game time, even with TV, was only 2:55. That is cookin'.
and that is a bad thing.
I think I am going to really hate the rule change regarding the clock by the end of the year.
Amen!
I always hate these rule changes that are designed to speed up the game. I love football! Why shorten it? These NCAA execs need to quit trying to squeeze an extra few minutes of advertising revenue out, and just let college football play the way it is supposed to.
More football would be better! Not less.