STATEMENT FROM BIG 12 ON JAMIE POLLARD

[ChrisMWilliams]

In accordance with the Big 12 Conference Principles and Standards of Sportsmanship, the Conference has issued a public reprimand of Iowa State University Director of Athletics Jamie Pollard for his comments following Saturday’s game against Oklahoma State. In addition, the Conference assessed a $25,000 fine for Pollard’s post-game remarks and put him on notice that any similar behavior will result in a more serious penalty.

“Mr. Pollard’s public statements called into question the integrity and competence of game officials and the Conference’s officiating program,â€￾ stated Commissioner Bob Bowlsby. “To imply that games are called unfairly to negatively impact a program is irresponsible and completely baseless. Accordingly, the seriousness of this violation warrants a public reprimand and a financial penalty. We take pride in our officiating programs and will continue to strive for the highest possible standards and the fairest competition.â€￾

JAMIE POLLARD STATEMENT

“Although on Saturday I felt the need to defend our players and our institution, Dr. Leath and I recognize that our decision to have me do so publicly was in violation of the conference’s sportsmanship guidelines and we accept the Commissioner’s punishment. Furthermore, I apologize for implying that Iowa State University’s vote against the addition of an eighth official at a conference meeting in 2013 impacted game officiating. It was inappropriate for me to do so. We are committed to working with the Big 12 Conference in the appropriate manner moving forward.â€￾

 

[Chipper]

In accordance with the Big 12 Conference Principles and Standards of Sportsmanship, the Conference has issued a public reprimand of Iowa State University Director of Athletics Jamie Pollard for his comments following Saturday’s game against Oklahoma State. In addition, the Conference assessed a $25,000 fine for Pollard’s post-game remarks and put him on notice that any similar behavior will result in a more serious penalty.

“Mr. Pollard’s public statements called into question the integrity and competence of game officials and the Conference’s officiating program,†stated Commissioner Bob Bowlsby. “To imply that games are called unfairly to negatively impact a program is irresponsible and completely baseless. Accordingly, the seriousness of this violation warrants a public reprimand and a financial penalty. We take pride in our officiating programs and will continue to strive for the highest possible standards and the fairest competition.â€

JAMIE POLLARD STATEMENT

“Although on Saturday I felt the need to defend our players and our institution, Dr. Leath and I recognize that our decision to have me do so publicly was in violation of the conference’s sportsmanship guidelines and we accept the Commissioner’s punishment. Furthermore, I apologize for implying that Iowa State University’s vote against the addition of an eighth official at a conference meeting in 2013 impacted game officiating. It was inappropriate for me to do so. We are committed to working with the Big 12 Conference in the appropriate manner moving forward.â€

He cryptically revealed the vote!

But wouldn't an eight official help if you question the officiating capacity?

 

[CornFedIABoy]

Excuse me Big XII, Jamie Pollard's public statements didn't call into question the integrity and competence of game officials or the Conference's officiating program, their own performance on Saturday and on prior occasions did that all by themselves.

 

[CYphyllis]

I really enjoy how he worked in the vote in question into his "apology".

 

[3TrueFans]

So why would we vote against an eighth official?

 

[CornFedIABoy]

He cryptically revealed the vote!

But wouldn't an eight official help if you question the officiating capacity?

The 8th official was intended to help accommodate the faster pace that some teams wished to play. By voting against it we put ourselves at odds with the refs for whom an extra spot is another paycheck.

 

[Mtowncyclone13]

His "apology" does make the original comments seem petty. An 8th official is not something to fall on the sword for.

 

[BoilerClone]

But wouldn't an eight official help if you question the officiating capacity?

If I remember, the addition of an 8th official was to speed up the game.
Speeding things up would probably not be a benefit to ISU.

 

[Cyballzz]

He cryptically revealed the vote!

But wouldn't an eight official help if you question the officiating capacity?

Just adding one more clown to the clown car...

 

[GTO]

So why would we vote against an eighth official?

Because you'd rather be ****ed by 7 refs than be gang banged by 8 refs.

 

[kentkel]

So why would we vote against an eighth official?

Because it increases the incompetence level on the field!

 

[A-town Cy]

I wish he didn't mention the vote now. We were against speeding the game up because we can't keep up.

 

[CEO]

He cryptically revealed the vote!

But wouldn't an eight official help if you question the officiating capacity?

I totally agree. I'm confused.

 

[hexodat64]

So we were the lone vote against the 8th official? Makes sense. Why would you want more incompetence on the field going against you?

 

[oldwiseman]

I think the words "completely baseless" are inappropriate considering how often we get apology letters.

For his comments I would like to issue Bob Bowlsby a public reprimand. Those seem to be quite effective.

 

[Pseudonym]

So Pollard really thinks its a giant conspiracy among the referees, that since he only wanted 7 per game, rather than 8, there would be less demand for them and fewer jobs--so they would punish Iowa State on the field? LOL.

I'm sorry, but what an idiot.

 

[Mtowncyclone13]

I wish he didn't mention the vote now. We were against speeding the game up because we can't keep up.

Yup. It sounded a lot better before we knew what it was

 

[FDWxMan]

How was the 8th official supposed to speed things up?

I thought adding an official was mainly because the refs themselves couldn't keep up with 7, which was leading to more blown calls?

 

[clonedude]

I totally agree. I'm confused.

The officials wanted to add an eighth official. It was in their best interest to do so.

ISU said we didn't think it was necessary, so of course, the officials probably don't care so much for ISU at this point.

 

[Cyclonepride]

So Pollard really thinks its a giant conspiracy among the referees, that since he only wanted 7 per game, rather than 8, there would be less demand for them and fewer jobs--so they would punish Iowa State on the field? LOL.

I'm sorry, but what an idiot.

Pseudonym for troll?