Yes, it is way too early for next year's rankings ...
- Thread starter surly
- Start date
To be fair we finished 6th this year. Dropping a spot after losing 3 starters and an all American isn't super crazy.
Only if you're biased. If objective, you would consider K-State in route to a considerably better season given everyone returns and the additional talent coming to Manhattan.
http://www.kansascity.com/sports/college/big-12/kansas-state/article58656163.html
Kansas State will still be one of the least talented teams in the conference. Oklahoma has two high level guards coming in this year plus return Woodard who is better than anyone Kansas State has but you choose to ignore that.
You do realize he's playing against a bunch of white kids that are 4+ inches shorter than him, right?
You won 5 games last year in the league, lose your best player, the rest of the conference adds talent to their roster and you have the worst coach in the conference. Truth hurts
Well, to be fair, look at all we had this past year and we finished a measly 6th
If given a choice between reason and facts, it's interesting how many people choose facts.
Correct, I'd say Iowa St underachieved. Naz's injury didn't help, but absolutely Iowa St should have been higher. I also think the Big 12 this past season and this coming season will be quite a bit different.
This year the Big 12 had the overall 1 seed, a 2 seed, a 3 seed, a 4 seed, two 5 seeds, and an 8 seed. No way the Big 12 had that many top rated teams next year.
I've said Iowa St can have less talent next season, and finish higher. Many reasons factor into that.
This is hilarious. Thank you for this. it will be a source of laughs all next season.
I don't think it takes being biased to question whether or not KSU will improve 4-5 wins from last year by losing their best player and bringing in some mediocre recruits. I can see KSU getting up to maybe 7-8 wins in the Big 12 but not much more than that.
Did you guys get a new coach too? If not, I'll believe improvement on the court when I see it.
Edwards is gone. He was the best player much of last year as a senior. But you're seriously not suggesting that he's better than all the returners plus the incoming recruits, are you? If so, competitive bias is seriously overlapping your judgement.
Alrighty. I'll pencil you in for KSU and 10 Big 12 wins. I'll take the under and we'll see who is right. Unless I missed a list that had more than just those two kids ranked 200/300 or whatever then your incoming recruits are irrelevant.
How is it tuco is the reasonable troll in this thread?
Would someone please explain to shurls how recruiting rankings work. I hate to rail on him too hard, but he's kind of sounding like hawk trolls last season, defending their bad recruits, and talking themselves into how great they were gunna be.
Would someone please explain to shurls how recruiting rankings work. I hate to rail on him too hard, but he's kind of sounding like hawk trolls last season, defending their bad recruits, and talking themselves into how great they were gunna be.
