CycloneErik
Well-Known Member
Yeah, I guess the NIT does have a bubble.
If only the Big 12 Tournament had a bubble, Weber would challenge for that.
Yeah, I guess the NIT does have a bubble.
Holy hell. You mean they're stars, yet you have them ranked 7th?
And please list kst's upgrade in talent. You talking about those two redshirt bigs? Better be bringing more than that. Kst missed their biggest chance to upgrade, and that was at the HC position.
To be fair we finished 6th this year. Dropping a spot after losing 3 starters and an all American isn't super crazy.
Saying Kansas State will finish 5th is the definition of crazy
Only if you're biased. If objective, you would consider K-State in route to a considerably better season given everyone returns and the additional talent.
Kansas State will still be one of the least talented teams in the conference. Oklahoma has two high level guards coming in this year plus return Woodard who is better than anyone Kansas State has but you choose to ignore that.
You do realize he's playing against a bunch of white kids that are 4+ inches shorter than him, right?These arguments are so silly on both sides. Who knows?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Ajbj78kKI8
You're just talking smack on K-State. Stop.
You're just talking smack on K-State. Stop.
You won 5 games last year in the league, lose your best player, the rest of the conference adds talent to their roster and you have the worst coach in the conference. Truth hurts
Holy hell. You mean they're stars, yet you have them ranked 7th?
And please list kst's upgrade in talent. You talking about those two redshirt bigs? Better be bringing more than that. Kst missed their biggest chance to upgrade, and that was at the HC position.
You know, K-State had UNC beat and did beat #1 OU this year when they had a point guard? They were in every game, pretty much, even without Stokes.
Well, the whole squad returns. And those three freshmen will be sophomores. Plus, two bigs come off redshirt. And a 4* comes to play. Both DJ Johnson and Wes Iwundu will star as seniors, to answer your question. The team goes on a Euro trip this summer. Last time, they came back from overseas to win a league banner. I look for a solid club next season. Very exciting.
Facts are hard - for you. These, are facts.
Well, to be fair, look at all we had this past year and we finished a measly 6th
This is hilarious. Thank you for this. it will be a source of laughs all next season.Not sure how to rank this league other than with Josh Jackson, Ku will dominate. So, here ... Ku - solid guards and another rent-a-player probably WVU - no reason to think Huggs is going away with that talent UT - bringing in more than returning Baylor - deep and athletic K-State - major upgrade Tech - returning pieces ISU - assuming Naz and Monte return oSu - Underwood inherits great guards OU - Lon will have to rebuild TCU - we'll see what coaching means
I don't think it takes being biased to question whether or not KSU will improve 4-5 wins from last year by losing their best player and bringing in some mediocre recruits. I can see KSU getting up to maybe 7-8 wins in the Big 12 but not much more than that.Only if you're biased. If objective, you would consider K-State in route to a considerably better season given everyone returns and the additional talent coming to Manhattan. http://www.kansascity.com/sports/college/big-12/kansas-state/article58656163.html
You know, K-State had UNC beat and did beat #1 OU this year when they had a point guard? They were in every game, pretty much, even without Stokes.
Well, the whole squad returns. And those three freshmen will be sophomores. Plus, two bigs come off redshirt. And a 4* comes to play. Both DJ Johnson and Wes Iwundu will star as seniors, to answer your question. The team goes on a Euro trip this summer. Last time, they came back from overseas to win a league banner. I look for a solid club next season. Very exciting.
I don't think it takes being biased to question whether or not KSU will improve 4-5 wins from last year by losing their best player and bringing in some mediocre recruits. I can see KSU getting up to maybe 7-8 wins in the Big 12 but not much more than that.
Alrighty. I'll pencil you in for KSU and 10 Big 12 wins. I'll take the under and we'll see who is right. Unless I missed a list that had more than just those two kids ranked 200/300 or whatever then your incoming recruits are irrelevant.Edwards is gone. He was the best player much of last year as a senior. But you're seriously not suggesting that he's better than all the returners plus the incoming recruits, are you? If so, competitive bias is seriously overlapping your judgement.