We won’t get Wigginton for four years
- Thread starter cyrocksmypants
- Start date
Like Kane, Stinson’s age was what did him in. And could potentially be the case with Wiggington if he stays all four years as well.
This is the non conference, we haven't faced a tournament team yet. Lets see how he does against BIG 12 competition, 18-20 games against P5 competition, in a row
Had a lot more to do with lack of ability to shoot the 3 ball. Wigs has a high end J.
I think Boise State has a legit shot at the tourney this year.
If Wiggs is 6'5" with a long wingspan he has enough skill he could go after this year. Since he's not he will have to show more to overcome that. Besides his development I think one other thing to consider is the draft pool each year.
He may very well be good enough to be an nba player but if there are more than 30 other college/international players more highly touted than it would make it a tough decision to come out early.
He may very well be good enough to be an nba player but if there are more than 30 other college/international players more highly touted than it would make it a tough decision to come out early.
UNI should make the tourney as well.
They’ll have to rattle off 3 wins in a row in the MVC tourney. Their at-large chances went down the tubes with their loss to ISU. Even if they beat Xavier, it leaves 0 margin for error in the conference season for an At-large bid. They have a decent RPI now, but that will drop quickly once they start playing MVC teams.
If they beat Xavier and string enough wins in the MVC, I think they could make it in with a loss in the MVC championship game. Their non-conference results are better than many B1G schools.
Yeah, basically zero margin for error and a loss in the MVC championship will leave them sweating on selection sunday. I could see them getting left out like Illinois St last year, although UNI’s non-con schedule is 100x better than Illinois St’s was.
Of course, all of this is moot if they don’t beat Xavier.
So UNI isn't going to make the tournament? Silly to say so at this point in light of their current record and their performance against teams such as Villanova and UNC. Even sillier to ignore the proof of seeing him play. I can only conclude you are clueless about what constitutes basketball talent
What he said is a little over the top and remains to be seen, but his point isn't too far off. We have the most important 19 games of our season still ahead of us. That gives us all the opportunity we need to build a tourney resume.
If he does not have talent he wouldn't be playing at a P5 School. But people think he is the second coming of Jamaal tinsley, he may be, but lets evaluate at the end of the year once he goes against real competition in the BIG 12.
Did somebody say Jamaal TInsley?
