UConn football player arrested for Child Porn

cyclonedave25

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Jul 10, 2007
21,444
11,165
113
Chicago, IL
you get 2 years dont you? Like 18 and 16 is ok, but 18 and 15 is 3 years so its not ok.
Not positive, but I think the punishment is a lot less harsh if its <2 years. It's probably the difference between a misdemeanor and a felony, or something like that.
 

cyhiphopp

Moderator
Staff member
Jan 9, 2009
33,266
14,537
113
Ankeny
you get 2 years dont you? Like 18 and 16 is ok, but 18 and 15 is 3 years so its not ok.

I believe it depends on the state law and varies from state to state. Sometimes it also depends if the younger persons parents press charges.
 

nhclone

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Nov 20, 2008
3,623
1,590
113
In Iowa, I'm pretty there is a 3 year rule after the girl turns 15. I'm sure it's different in Conn. though.
 

Gorm

With any luck we will be there by Tuesday.
Jul 6, 2010
5,838
2,717
113
Cedar Rapids, IA
In Iowa, I'm pretty there is a 3 year rule after the girl turns 15. I'm sure it's different in Conn. though.

I'm not sure that rule applies to pictures, just the actual act.

The zero tolerance of many states has gotten a bit out of hand. I was reading on CNN the other day that some wal-mart in Arizona refused to develop photos of some 2 & 3 year olds first bath or something like that on the family's role of film. Needless to say the family wasn't happy about it.
 

nhclone

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Nov 20, 2008
3,623
1,590
113
I'm not sure that rule applies to pictures, just the actual act.

The zero tolerance of many states has gotten a bit out of hand. I was reading on CNN the other day that some wal-mart in Arizona refused to develop photos of some 2 & 3 year olds first bath or something like that on the family's role of film. Needless to say the family wasn't happy about it.

You make a good point with the picture versus act comment. That seems kind of weird to me that you can do something, but aren't allowed to record it. Bet that's a real bummer for some people :cool:
 

Pittcrew

Member
Nov 10, 2008
44
1
8
Sioux City
Not positive, but I think the punishment is a lot less harsh if its <2 years. It's probably the difference between a misdemeanor and a felony, or something like that.

A misdemeanor sex charge conviction still lands you on the sex offender registry. Sure, the jail time is less harsh than a felony, but being on the registry is an awful punishment in itself. A misdemeanor conviction requires a minimum of 10 years on the registry in Iowa. It's even more harsh in other states. Nebraska is one of the worst.
 

CycoCyclone

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Apr 6, 2009
5,521
836
113
Urbandale
State police said they found videos on McKee's computer of children ranging in age from 8 to 15 engaging in sexual activity, and that there was evidence that he had transmitted the videos to others on the Internet.

That's not just a HS girl
 

theyork

Well-Known Member
Aug 6, 2009
1,466
42
48
43
hedgesville, wv
if two 17 year olds are sexually active with each other are they both "child molesters"? or is it only from the day of your 18th that you are "old" enough to know better than to be sexually active with someone who may be as little as 1 day removed from being a minor?
 

VTXCyRyD

Well-Known Member
Sep 2, 2010
5,626
2,961
113
Better yet, are you a child molester if you are under 18 and masturbate? If so I am guilty 1000 times over:wideeyed:
 

edr247

Well-Known Member
Aug 4, 2010
1,957
57
48
Better yet, are you a child molester if you are under 18 and masturbate? If so I am guilty 1000 times over:wideeyed:

Really...didn't need to know that.

Also, yes. Better turn yourself and place yourself on the sex offenders registry.
 

Judoka

Well-Known Member
Jun 16, 2010
17,542
2,645
113
Timbuktu

edr247

Well-Known Member
Aug 4, 2010
1,957
57
48
Reading the article, I didn't get the impression that the second guy is a football player.

However, if half of the UConn football team is in jail by next September for underage gay porn, then I have to like our odds...

Yeah, I don't think the other guy is a football player. He is, however, the president of the French Club.

As for the actual charges, looks like it actually was child pornography, and not just some pictures of his 17 year old girlfriend or something. Although, it's kind of hard to tell why he did it. He admits he had it, and he was supposed to send it to somebody. So, was he doing it out of his own personal pleasure, or was it for money, or what?
 

CyLoboClone

Well-Known Member
Oct 15, 2009
2,567
124
63
Albuquerque
Age of concent varies from state to state, but for the most part it is 17, however if you take a picture, you are ****ed.
 

CyLoboClone

Well-Known Member
Oct 15, 2009
2,567
124
63
Albuquerque
And that goes for taking pictures of your naked self too- imagine if the police busted the picture taker as well as the picture holder- try explaining that to you dad if you are busted sending a naughty picture to your boyfriend. I have a daughter now and I dont know what sort of rage I would have, but I do know that it would be a fault in my own parenting too.
 

Latest posts

Help Support Us

Become a patron