I would expect Husker fans to fully embrace this as their national championship.By the way, since their coach is at Nebraska when they announced this will the big 10 claim another conference championship? I'm expecting it.
I agree with you, I also like this set up.
I agree with you, I also like this set up.
This is exactly why the playoffs need to expand. To allow top tier G5 schools to get their shot. Bias will always keep them out with the 4 team system.
No this is not a reason why. While there are plenty of other reasons, going undefeated against the 54th "toughest" schedule is not a reason to expand the playoffs.
I declare myself king of America.
I like it too, the only problem I see is what happens if you get two or three undefeated GF teams? You could see them really water down their non con schedule to go undefeated
They can only play whose in front of them.
This part is false. Since 1988, besides the 1997 UNL Cornhuskers/UM Wolverines when has there not been vast agreement on the champion?
That said, UCF can say they beat Auburn but won't get a chance to play the team Auburn beat...
Wait...you can do that? Why didn't we do that?
I agree with you, I also like this set up.
Wait...you can do that? Why didn't we do that?
That said, UCF can say they beat Auburn but won't get a chance to play the team Auburn beat...
Well, they have a better case than these bozos have on some of their conference championship claims:
https://deadspin.com/5941380/texas-...onships-two-conference-titles-over-the-summer
I say more power to them.
By the way, since their coach is at Nebraska when they announced this will the big 10 claim another conference championship? I'm expecting it.