Not a fighter but this guy got the book thrown at him because he was a lethal weapon.I don't think there are special legal rules for boxers and MMA fighters in fights.
Not a fighter but this guy got the book thrown at him because he was a lethal weapon.I don't think there are special legal rules for boxers and MMA fighters in fights.
Ah, Chris' Go Go. The good ole days, indeed.Several Iowa State wrestlers at my best friends bachelor party in mid 80s. Bus ended tour at strip club in Cambridge. Said wrestler gently picked stripper off the stage for an elevated lap dance and spin knocking table of beers off said large local boys. After gently repositioning said stripper bsck on stage wrestler offers to buy a round and locals said no. Punched said wrestler square in face and got no reaction from him.... for about 3 seconds. Ended very badly for locals. More to story after bus pulled over on way back to Ames by local Cambridge sheriff. Lots of cash put into deputy hat to cover damage. On we went. The good ol days.
FWIW, Parizek was on 1460 this AM and he thought it would be a tough case against the MMA guy.There are no special rules, but I believe it's one of those things that can be argued based on the training/skills you have. You can use the minimum necessary force to defend yourself. Is there a point where a trained fighter crosses the minimum necessary imaginary line?
As many have referenced, there is an enormous difference between a fighter and an athlete. I don't care how much you can bench, how fast you run, how big your muscles are, etc., those wrestlers and MMA dudes are a different breed.
I can remember certain people of this background at college parties and it always seemed to be a "not if but when" with them getting in a fight.
FWIW, Parizek was on 1460 this AM and he thought it would be a tough case against the MMA guy.
To me the only really excessive thing I saw was the end with the dude in the beanie and denim guy.I think the excessive would come from you took him down and punched him a bunch, obviously won the fight, but did you also need the rear naked choke hold? (Not sure what that move actually is, just heard it before.)
It may be a tough case, but you know a lawyer will sure try.
Either way, I still enjoyed the video.
To me the only really excessive thing I saw was the end with the dude in the beanie and denim guy.
Im interested to hear how it all got started.
I would say he did not get excessive. It's not the UFC with a ref. When you are in a bar fight you have to win and go hard if nobody is stepping in. If you allow the guy back up and back off, a lot of guys will restart the fight now that they are not getting beat. Every fight I have been in with the exception of one was broken up and there was a little blood. One I had the guy down. Thought I did enough and stopped, dude got back up and started throwing again. I think part of the problem these days is people not breaking the fight up. Usually you kind of do a hockey fight type situation. When someone get's the upper hand and lands a few, people should jump in and stop it.
That’s the part I didn’t like.I was surprised by that too. Especially at the end when beanie guy was wailing on turtleneck boy, who looked to be out cold from the throw into the wall.
I was surprised by that too. Especially at the end when beanie guy was wailing on turtleneck boy, who looked to be out cold from the throw into the wall.
Too much WWE influence there as guy recording it gives blow by blow commentary and cheers them on.I'm guessing most of those guys saw what was happening and didn't try to break it up in fear of getting themselves in a similar situation as Jones and Turtleneck. The thing I hate about society these days is the fact that somebody took the effort to record video of the fight but nobody thought to stop it.