NFL: Offseason Thread

Rural

Well-Known Member
Feb 3, 2010
43,169
36,406
113
Are you seriously not going to watch Monday Night Football because you don't like the broadcasting team?

I usually only make time to watch if my favorite team is playing, but if I had more time I would watch pretty much any NFL game on TV. Who cares who is announcing?


I pretty much don't watch anymore, the team doesn't matter.
 

cyhiphopp

Moderator
Staff member
Jan 9, 2009
33,276
14,551
113
Ankeny
I pretty much don't watch anymore, the team doesn't matter.

You don't watch MNF at all? Are you not a big NFL fan? Do you not have a favorite team you like to watch?

Just curious.

If it's a big NFL match up and I have time, I will watch, but usually I have time to watch my favorite teams games and that's about it, if I'm lucky.
 

Rural

Well-Known Member
Feb 3, 2010
43,169
36,406
113
You don't watch MNF at all? Are you not a big NFL fan? Do you not have a favorite team you like to watch?

Just curious.

If it's a big NFL match up and I have time, I will watch, but usually I have time to watch my favorite teams games and that's about it, if I'm lucky.


I meant the announce team, sure I have a team.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cyhiphopp

CTTB78

Well-Known Member
Apr 7, 2006
9,540
4,518
113
Maybe they can give him a cut of some of that worthless stock that they gouged Pack fans for like 25 bucks a pop a few years ago.

But all of those Packer fans got a piece of 'ownership' paper that they frame and hang on their wall.
 

BigJCy

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
25,046
21,892
113
This surprises me a bit. Have always thought he was a pretty solid player:

 

jbindm

Well-Known Member
Dec 2, 2010
13,073
7,605
113
Des Moines
This surprises me a bit. Have always thought he was a pretty solid player:



Cap move, not really a knock on him. It saves Philly around 4 million against the cap this year.

I do wonder if he'll look to sign somewhere right away or wait until closer to the start of the season. Now that teams have spent in free agency and filled other roster holes in the draft, he might be better off waiting for an opportunity due to injury or suspension.
 

BigJCy

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
25,046
21,892
113
This does a pretty good job of showing the New Kickoff rules for the NFL this season:



Dd1b4TEUQAAMaQC.jpg
 

jbindm

Well-Known Member
Dec 2, 2010
13,073
7,605
113
Des Moines
https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.c...y-team-in-league-necessarily-needs-a-no-1-wr/

That's an interesting take by Dak Prescott. I know he's obligated to say something like that to prop up his receiving corps of no-namers, but he might have a legitimate point to some extent. I think that an NFL team would always welcome a stud player at any position, but I wonder if WR is about to become the new RB in terms of value around the league. It might be one of those positions where you can cut corners a little and invest in other parts of the roster.
 

SCyclone

Well-Known Member
Mar 11, 2014
9,475
12,233
113
Fort Dodge, IA
Green Bay has managed their cap situation very well over the last 25 or so years. Ron Wolf started it, Ted Thompson continued it, and Brian Gutekunst and Russ Ball have learned from those fellas.

I have no doubt they will create a cap-friendly deal for Rodgers (i.e., front-end loaded, bonus driven, etc) that will keep them able to operate as they have been since Wolf came.

It helps when you don't have a GM leaping blindly into free agency each year....and what's really amazing is that drafting in a disadvantageous position hasn't hindered them from being in playoff (and Super Bowl) contention almost every year.

I understand that lots of fans look down their noses at the Packers, but you really can't argue with the results.
 

cyhiphopp

Moderator
Staff member
Jan 9, 2009
33,276
14,551
113
Ankeny
Green Bay has managed their cap situation very well over the last 25 or so years. Ron Wolf started it, Ted Thompson continued it, and Brian Gutekunst and Russ Ball have learned from those fellas.

I have no doubt they will create a cap-friendly deal for Rodgers (i.e., front-end loaded, bonus driven, etc) that will keep them able to operate as they have been since Wolf came.

It helps when you don't have a GM leaping blindly into free agency each year....and what's really amazing is that drafting in a disadvantageous position hasn't hindered them from being in playoff (and Super Bowl) contention almost every year.

I understand that lots of fans look down their noses at the Packers, but you really can't argue with the results.

I really like the Packers strategy, as it is similar to the Steelers. Don't overpay for free agents and build through good drafts.

There are tough years when you lose a key free agent, but they usually go to someone who's overpaying and their best years are usually past them.

Steelers have come out on the right side for a lot of their free agents they didn't resign. Not positive on the Packers record in that respect but I think it's pretty good.

You just have to be able to evaluate talent and replace the lost free agents well.
 

SCyclone

Well-Known Member
Mar 11, 2014
9,475
12,233
113
Fort Dodge, IA
I really like the Packers strategy, as it is similar to the Steelers. Don't overpay for free agents and build through good drafts.

There are tough years when you lose a key free agent, but they usually go to someone who's overpaying and their best years are usually past them.

Steelers have come out on the right side for a lot of their free agents they didn't resign. Not positive on the Packers record in that respect but I think it's pretty good.

You just have to be able to evaluate talent and replace the lost free agents well.

Casey Hayward and Micah Hyde are the two examples I can think of that came back to bite them - other than that, not sure. Maybe could have kept Julius Peppers one more year, too.

But I agree - draft and develop is the best philosophy for sustained success.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cyhiphopp