anybody questioning if TJ would take the job...
Is there anyone on our side who questions whether or not he’d take the job? I think most of us agree that he’d crawl to Ames if offered.
anybody questioning if TJ would take the job...
Maybe it's just a coping mechanism as a fan, but I don't think with a healthy Georges that season ends much differently. UConn handled ISU pretty much throughout the game and responded every time ISU would get within striking distance. Also, a direct result of Georges being out was thrusting Hogue into a prominent role offensively. All that BAMF did was go for 34.
Now the MSU game in 2000 - there's no coping mechanism there. There's no doubt in both games in the final four ISU would've been significant favorites in both remaining games.
anybody questioning if TJ would take the job...
On the SDSU side I think that is tougher than people give credit for. Yeah they had a solid foundation and a great player but he took over for a coach who had been there 20 years. That isn’t always an easy transition and it went about as smooth as it can go.I'm definitely not opposed to TJ, but I think people also have to keep in mind at SDSU he inherited one of the best players in the history of the Summit League. Now, does he deserve some credit for helping that happen, absolutely. But the years prior to TJ at SDSU were:
- NCAA Round of 32
- NCAA Round of 32
- CBI
- NIT
- NCAA Round of 64
And since he's left they are 19-5 in the conference.
Also, in terms of UNLV, he has not really improved on what Menzies did there.
anybody questioning if TJ would take the job...
@jpete24
We all know how that team ended that season -- as you said, backslide in February, rumors of a toxic locker room, before putting it together in Kansas City and falling just short to #11 Ohio State.
But you can't cherrypick one month (or even just a few weeks) of a long season in judging it. That team had some nice accomplishments. It's one of the better, top 10-15, in program history.
Could it have been more? Sure.
Did it have three NBA guys? Sure, but one of them has a career 11 points and 28 minutes in the NBA (Shayok) and the other two were 17-year old freshmen when they showed up to Ames that year.
Underachieved? Sure, probably. But you have to look at the totality of the evidence.
Back to the 2015 team...
SENIORS = 1 future NBA guy (Dejean-Jones) plus Hogue, who won all-Big 12 honorable mention
JUNIORS = 3 future NBA guys (Mitrou-Long, Nader, and Niang) plus McKay, who won Big 12 DPOTY
SOPHOMORES = 2 future NBA guys (Morris and Thomas), both of which had significant experience and playing time as freshmen before heading into their sophomore seasons
Total NBA minutes and points for those six...
Morris = 4,283 MP and 1,795 PTS
Nader = 2,244 MP and 809 PTS
Niang = 1,907 MP and 785 PTS
Thomas = 518 MP and 237 PTS
Dejean-Jones = 279 MP and 79 PTS
Mitrou-Long = 132 MP and 33 PTS
I will never understand why people want to complain about the 2019 team not winning the Big 12 regular season rather than the 2015 team. The 2015 team really should have been the year.
Special bonus content!
The 2015 team also had a weak February (4-4). They needed a miracle comeback against an excellent Oklahoma team in Hilton to avoid ending the season on a 1-3 skid, too. And they also had some reports of a toxic locker room. Dejean-Jones supposedly erupting at the halftime of the UAB game (rumored to have thrown some furniture) and then audibly cursing Hoiberg out on the TV broadcast while Matt A. and McKay try to restrain him... not a good look and not much good said about program and team chemistry right there.
The 2015 team has everything disliked about the 2019 team only 5x as much of it.
On the SDSU side I think that is tougher than people give credit for. Yeah they had a solid foundation and a great player but he took over for a coach who had been there 20 years. That isn’t always an easy transition and it went about as smooth as it can go.
UNLV is just a weird school to analyze. Menzies was .500 there and .352 in conference. I’m not they were trending up though. I’m honestly not sure why he got fired. Either way finishing 2nd in your first year is pretty good.
WBBTj's wife was a volleyball player here wasn't she? Or WBB?
wbbTj's wife was a volleyball player here wasn't she? Or WBB?
I have always doubted that team makes it much further than it did with Georges.
They were #25 on Bart Torvik that season. Their problem with UConn was the problem they had all year -- they could score at an elite level and in bunches, but they couldn't stop anybody and usually got killed on the boards. Like you said, that is how it played out with UConn, too. I don't see a way Georges would have been more efficient than the touches that went to Hogue, too, considering Hogue had easily the game of his life, yet they still fell short.
Even if they get past the Huskies, they still have to play...
(All rankings from Bart Torvik.)
#8 Michigan State
#3 Florida
#22 Kentucky
We probably would not have been favored in any of those three games. I doubt we could have replicated UConn's miracle run where they seemed to be hitting every hunk of junk they toss up.
We had a nice run in Kansas City, sure, but here is who we beat
#39 Kansas State
#11 Kansas (without Embidd)
#26 Baylor
We hadn't beaten anybody nearly as good as Michigan State or Florida that year save Michigan (#9).
The Fizer-Tinsley team had two games to go and would have been heavy favorites in both. The path to the national championship was paved in gold for them. The Georges' foot team, had they gotten past UConn, would have had three to go and wouldn't have been favored in any of the three save maybe Kentucky. Yes, that team probably had the best shot at a Final Four of any other since, but it was still a long shot compared to the 2000 squad.
Alison is probably my favorite player for the women of all-time.
She always had this look on her face like she was looking for an ass to kick.
That team was outstanding on the defensive glass. The best offensive asset of that team was being able to initiate offence from 3 of the 5 starters(Kane, Monte and Niang). The drop off in play from Niang to Edozie was... considerable.
Huh. Looks like it can be done during the season:
If Steve Prohm was a complete jackass of a coach personality wise (like Mad Fran) I could understand the vitriol thrown at the guy when losses started mounting up...but, because he wasn't like that...and for all intents and purposes represented the university with respect and dignity...I will appreciate the good things he did as a coach. When we start trash talking other Big12 schools on the number of Big12 tourney titles we have, we certainly are not leaving out the ones Prohm won because "they under achieved" as a team or "those were Fred's players".
We have enough other things in our world to hate today than to add Steve Prohm to the list. If and when he's gone, I'll appreciate the good things and leave the bad in my rear view mirror and move forward.
You have to look at the 2019 in context also as to why I think it was a failure. Alot of us knew at the time how good they were but also knew after it played out that 9-9 was the absolute pinnacle of success that Prohm would have.Does anyone look back at the '15 Big 12 tourney as evidence that team didn't underachieve? That is was a good season? That Fred is a good coach? Did Fred sandwich that season between a 9th and 10th place finish? The '19 team gets criticized IMO because so many people use it to defend Prohm as a coach, including JP. He pointed directly to it as why Prohm shouldn't receive criticism in his plea last season. It's a huge reason he got his extension, that naturally (and fairly) opens it up to more criticism. It's much more complicated than the final result, in a lot of ways, it foreshadowed where the program was headed. You guys act like no one ever criticized Fred, had he followed that season up with a 20 loss season and anther 10th place finish, would you be defending that season?
I think the biggest difference between how the seasons are perceived as time goes by, is that Fred wasn't around afterwards. I see it as the crescendo of all of the issues we knew existed under Fred finally coming to light. To that point, we heard about these things but they didn't really seep on to the floor. They got swept under the rug because he kept winning. Had he stuck around, there would have been more focus on those things and criticism of how that season played out. had he followed those up with two awful seasons, that season would have gotten more attention as this negative turning point for the program.
For Prohm, '19 was similar but he had to stick around and face the music. It could have gone either way, he could have shut down some of that criticism by winning but his struggles have only magnified how that season finished. Again, the extension that directly resulted from it isn't giving him any leeway. The concerns people had about how that season ended played out these last two seasons, the reality is, after the '15 season, the program was still strong enough to bounce back and prove that was a fluke. The '19 team seems more like the exception than the rule and the program wasn't strong enough to bounce back or to build off that season.
I still think the advanced statistics struggle with our teams. Fred’s teams had more variability and could absolutely lose to some bad teams. They also could beat anybody. In basketball I think the more variable higher upside is better. It’s all about getting hot and beating teams. If the NCAA tournament was replace with the NBA playoffs that would change. I also think that is especially true for Iowa State and Hilton. We’ve built our culture on willing them to victory. When we were down 20 at half to Oklahoma I knew we would win that game. The advanced stats don’t understand that concept....yet the computer ranking still had them #25 nationally.
Bart Torvik had the "hated" 2019 team #16.
Both were very good teams, mind you, but I think the legend of the Kane-Ejim team is somewhat overstated. On the flip side, the 2019 team is slightly underrated (at least from what I can tell of the median fan on here).
Menzies at UNLV in the MWC:
4-14
8-10
11-7
They were pretty much the definition of trending up. And his previous 9 seasons at NMSU they finished 1st, 2nd and 3rd three times each.
So the guy could clearly coach and was trending in the right direction, but they canned him anyway. And they didn't can him to hire TJ, they canned him to hire Beard.
If I'm TJ I am absolutely bolting if ISU comes calling.
On the SDSU side I think that is tougher than people give credit for. Yeah they had a solid foundation and a great player but he took over for a coach who had been there 20 years. That isn’t always an easy transition and it went about as smooth as it can go.
UNLV is just a weird school to analyze. Menzies was .500 there and .352 in conference. I’m not they were trending up though. I’m honestly not sure why he got fired. Either way finishing 2nd in your first year is pretty good.
If Steve Prohm was a complete jackass of a coach personality wise (like Mad Fran) I could understand the vitriol thrown at the guy when losses started mounting up...but, because he wasn't like that...and for all intents and purposes represented the university with respect and dignity...I will appreciate the good things he did as a coach. When we start trash talking other Big12 schools on the number of Big12 tourney titles we have, we certainly are not leaving out the ones Prohm won because "they under achieved" as a team or "those were Fred's players".
We have enough other things in our world to hate today than to add Steve Prohm to the list. If and when he's gone, I'll appreciate the good things and leave the bad in my rear view mirror and move forward.