*** Official #16 Seton Hall vs IOWA STATE Game(Day) Thread ***

Cyched

CF Influencer
May 8, 2009
38,227
66,041
113
Colorado
I know Nixon has been our whipping boy so far this year. I know his shooting has been suspect. But what he brings in toughness on D suggests we maybe should lay off him. He is providing tremendous value.

During Atlantis I said I wasn’t quite sold on him yet. I’ve warmed up to him since then; last night he was outstanding, and seems to be finding his niche as our bulldog defender who can occasionally generate some offense.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bozclone

CyPunch

Well-Known Member
May 3, 2019
4,707
11,988
113
Sandy Springs, GA
Conditt needs to play as much as possible. Interested to see his +/- for the game.

Nixon had his standard game: 2/7 with good D.

Need to start getting more from the bench besides George.

Griffin kind of seems like Lewis 2.0.

Jacobson +13
Bolton +11
Haliburton +10
Nixon +9
Grill +5
Conditt +4
Young +2
Jackson -1
Griffin -3

http://stats.statbroadcast.com/broadcast/?id=283539
 
  • Informative
Reactions: isutrevman and Doc

Cyinthenorth

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 29, 2013
15,887
11,970
113
36
Dubuque
Losing Mamu changed the entire trajectory of the game. Does ISU win if he doesn't get hurt <5 min in to the game? Can't answer that questions one way or the other, but it certainly did hurt Seton Hall. But, stuff happens and you need to be able to respond. SH gave it their best go without him

I do think the whistles favored us a tad, not going to lie. The particular instance I can think of is Nixon getting fouled on a 3 by Powell who basically grazed his jersey. Happened at a pivotal moment with momentum getting away from SH. Hopefully we get those calls Thursday, but I won't be waiting with baited breath. Iowa is going to be allowed to hack and maim with guys like Pemsl, Evelyn, and Kriener. They did it the other night vs Michigan I noticed. Fran bringing in those guys only to foul, since Michigan was out-talenting them so bad. He'd sub Wieskamp, Garza, and Bohannon back in between free throws. Thug tactics.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: LincolnSwinger

Sigmapolis

Minister of Economy
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Aug 10, 2011
26,872
41,465
113
Waukee
At this point he is much more proven than Grill and Jackson. I think they will end up being better offensive weapons by the end of the year but they do not look fully comfortable out there yet.

I know Nixon has been our whipping boy so far this year. I know his shooting has been suspect. But what he brings in toughness on D suggests we maybe should lay off him. He is providing tremendous value.

I was critical of Nixon earlier in the season, and so were many others. I never said, nor did any other reasonable people say, though, that he sucked and should not play. I thought maybe it would have made sense at some point to play Jackson or Grill ahead of him to build for the future if some of his woes continued, but that has not been the case. Nixon has been much better the past few weeks playing to his strengths.

Not that he was listening to us, but there was a reasonable criticism of his play that he needed to stop trying to create his own offense and let Haliburton or Bolton make it for him and just concentrate on being a bulldog. He has done that, and hence his defense has improved and his offensive efficiency has gone up. I am glad Nixon and Prohm identified that and shaped him up to defer on offense and maul on defense.

I loved playing Seton Hall again, especially so soon. It was physical, but not chippy. Refs really let them bang down low and the pace of the game reflected that.

I would also like to play a home and away in the same season with a good non-con team like Seton Hall. I know that won't happen, but I think it could be cool.

That was fun, but we essentially have nine versions of that in the Big 12 -- all the more reason a ten-team double round-robin is the absolute best format.

I could see my way through to doing something like that with a neat opponent (e.g., a regional non-con rival like a Big Ten West team or Missouri) where both fan bases could maybe travel to each other, but you run the risk of having a lame match-up twice if the two teams were not on about the same level as each other.

The season could go anywhere, but the ingredients are there to not be sweating it out during the Big 12 Tourney for a bid. It's not a perfect roster, but Prohm did a great job having this program being more than competitive after losing 5 key contributors last year.

Haliburton - Figuring out how to be the super-star. He has a bigger load to carry than Niang or Monte, but the supporting cast is falling into place.

Bolton - Has the extra gear the team needs. Also knows how to play with Haliburton to make the team better.

Conditt - Can become that 3rd star, basically what we hoped Lard would be.

Young and Jacobsen - May not be exciting, but seem to accept their roles. On a given night, either one of them could be the x-factor the team needs.

Nixon - Best on ball defender since C Babb. It's been awhile since we've had someone that can effectively keep a 1 or 2 from getting exactly where they want to go. I think he is figuring out his role on offense.

I think most agree that ISU is better with Conditt on the floor, but I think his total minutes don't need to change a whole lot - he's going hard every minute he's out there, and that shouldn't change. If that means he's maxed out at 22 minutes or so, so be it. One thing none of these three have had before this year is the freedom to be aggressive and not worry about fouls. Last night when ISU was struggling in the first half Jacobsen kept us afloat with some key offensive rebounds and buckets, and Solo did the same to stop a couple Seton Hall runs in the second half.

I think the case is obvious the Conditt is our third-best or even our second-best player right now. That being said, I think total minutes and who plays at the end is more important than who formally starts, and, like you said, Conditt has a practical limit on the minutes he can play physically and because of fouls/his aggression on defense.

Prohm is toggling between Jacobson/Young, Jacobson/Conditt, and four-guard line-ups with Jacobson in the middle (as we did last year, and Jacobson has been his most productive when matched up 1v1 on the block with four guards around him this year, too) and then Conditt in the middle looking for lobs, swats, and altered shots.

Prohm seems to be getting the rotation down. Having three viable big men is a really nice luxury, and I forgot what it was like. We have been terrified of fouls and fatigue down there for so long because we only had 1-2 true posts you could play in the Big 12 that now we can see when you can tell those guys to go hard and be willing to physically challenge opponents at the rim and on the boards, who cares about a few fouls.

I will note, too, imagining the future, that we are going to have 40 minutes per night of a Conditt type with Foster coming into the program. That will be fun. You can tell them both to go hard as the 1 in a 4/1 for 20 minutes per game, rotate Solomon in there around them to give a two-big look, or play them together (if Foster can play as a 4 man, like Jacobson does an okay job doing) and have some frightening length on defense.
 
Last edited:

NoCreativity

Well-Known Member
Nov 12, 2015
12,440
10,769
113
Des Moines
Just a couple of my thoughts on the game/team:
-That was a fun game. The atmosphere was the best it's been since before last season. Although, I didn't make the KU game last year so maybe that was a good one? Anyway, the energy was fantastic last night.

-Echoing a lot of other's feelings here but man is it fun to watch a team play hard like they did. It's so easy to root for this team even with the offensive woes.

-I'm seeing a lot of "Conditt should start" on here and barring an injury to Solo or MJ I just don't think that's gonna happen. He's been great. Amazing really at times. But he's a 6'10" rim-running big that exerts a huge amount of energy on the defensive end. Even not starting he still got 19 min's last night and as someone else said "...he was grabbing his shorts a lot." Some can disagree, but seniority is a huge factor in how Prohm chooses starters. As Conditt keeps developing I bet we see some 25 minute games later in the season but Solo and MJ will start throughout.

Agreed, Conditt is out best big but I noticed he look gassed at times last night. He's exerting alot of energy on both sides so I dont know if he has the stamina to go Haliburton/Nixon/Bolton minutes.

I think the rotation is fine how it is right now, Conditt seems to be best around the 20 minute mark, start trying to play him more and you might start getting diminishing returns. He picked up 3 bad fouls last night also which could be a problem.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Cytasticlone

ISUChippewa

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Apr 10, 2006
7,262
7,636
113
I've asked before but I'm still trying to see what the hype over Griffin was about.

Yeah, might as well go ahead and yank his scholarship now...

I know that comes off as pretty salty, but I really don't understand the need for the fanbase to be so critical of a few of our players after a big win.

I know he missed his only shot, but he also had a block and a steal in only a couple of minutes of playing time. No need to throw him under the bus.
 

Doc

This is it Morty
Aug 6, 2006
37,437
21,963
113
Denver
Last edited:

LanningIsBakersDaddy

Well-Known Member
Nov 7, 2019
507
703
93
27
Chicago, IL
I know it hasn't been the greatest start for Zion, but I think some are hopping off the bandwagon I bit early.
I think Zion has a lot of potential, the thing I don't get is that he comes in the game and on offense all he does is shoot 3s. With his build I feel like he should be getting into the lane and aggressively finishing at the rim...
 

Sigmapolis

Minister of Economy
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Aug 10, 2011
26,872
41,465
113
Waukee
Also with Conditt: for a big guy he’s got a nice FT shot

He's a career 30/43 (70%) and 17/25 (68%) this season after last night.

Those are not great, but they are good enough for a big man that hack-a-Shaq does not become a default strategy. He was 7/8 last night, though, which had a big part in us winning the game, so hopefully he continues that.

Yeah, might as well go ahead and yank his scholarship now...

I know that comes off as pretty salty, but I really don't understand the need for the fanbase to be so critical of a few of our players after a big win.

I know he missed his only shot, but he also had a block and a steal in only a couple of minutes of playing time. No need to throw him under the bus.

I don't see Griffin playing much once the Big 12 season starts. He completely bricked his only shot last night then was never seen again.

I do not mean this to be specifically critical of Griffin, but we have been playing nine, and that is likely going to shrink down to 7-8 in the next few weeks.

Griffin is just going to be the odd man out right now. Conditt is obviously firmly a sixth man, and the competition between Jackson and Grill is ongoing (and you still might need both of them at some point, especially if we keep playing four guards in stretches), but things are about to get "real." The experimentation on lineups and roles is going to end, and I think Griffin is just going to be without a chair when that music stops.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: BigCyFan

Dingus

Well-Known Member
May 23, 2013
3,050
1,286
113
I think Zion has a lot of potential, the thing I don't get is that he comes in the game and on offense all he does is shoot 3s. With his build I feel like he should be getting into the lane and aggressively finishing at the rim...
Iirc last year he was up in Naz territory as far as % of shots as 3’s. Which doesn’t seem like where he should be.
 

madguy30

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Nov 15, 2011
57,209
55,100
113
Yeah, might as well go ahead and yank his scholarship now...

I know that comes off as pretty salty, but I really don't understand the need for the fanbase to be so critical of a few of our players after a big win.

I know he missed his only shot, but he also had a block and a steal in only a couple of minutes of playing time. No need to throw him under the bus.

Wasn't trying to be critical. There was hype around him, and so far he comes in for a few minutes and shoots once or twice and is done.

If Prohm was so excited about him, what happens that he's not playing more?
 

madguy30

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Nov 15, 2011
57,209
55,100
113
I don't know if we see Conditt in the starting line up any time soon, but I don't think we have to. I think Prohm loves the way Conditt brings that extra juice off the bench, and like Alabama and both Games vs Seton Hall, he will be in there during the most critical points/end of game. You don't have to start to get starter minutes/impact as much as a starter.

Given Prohms track record, I think this is the most likely path moving forward. That being said, Solo and Jacobson have been solid in there as well, it is just obvious there is a spark with Conditt. Solo's offense has been great, and although I know he gets ripped for his rebounding percentage, he is more often than not working to block his guy out which opens up space for another ISU player to grab it. He's just not physically imposing enough to push back players 4 inches tller than him and elevate for the board. Here and there I will be calling for Prohm to get GC in to the game earlier in the first half, but all in all I like the set up Prohm has been running with for the Bigs, and I foresee Conditt's minutes continuing to rise.

Yeah some players' strengths are how they fit best.

Conditt coming off the bench and flying around is a great thing to transition to after Young's calm demeanor.

I think Young's ability to make a 5 on defense have to step out is being underappreciated.
 

srjclone

Well-Known Member
Nov 17, 2014
11,927
11,254
113
Downtown Minneapolis
Yeah some players' strengths are how they fit best.

Conditt coming off the bench and flying around is a great thing to transition to after Young's calm demeanor.

I think Young's ability to make a 5 on defense have to step out is being underappreciated.
If he can consistently hit the mid range jumper out to 18 feet like he has been to start this season, it is huge for opening up things on the offensive end. We have guards who can drive and get to the rim against almost anyone (finishing, last night, was tough to come by. But missed lay ups are easier to correct) so having a big at the 5 who can at least make Big Men have to worry about him, it's a great thing for our offense.
 

Stormin

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
45,464
14,328
113
Conditt is becoming a force. Love his potential. Love that he is delivering results. Our Bigs are playing well enough.
 

Latest posts

Help Support Us

Become a patron