At this point he is much more proven than Grill and Jackson. I think they will end up being better offensive weapons by the end of the year but they do not look fully comfortable out there yet.
I know Nixon has been our whipping boy so far this year. I know his shooting has been suspect. But what he brings in toughness on D suggests we maybe should lay off him. He is providing tremendous value.
I was critical of Nixon earlier in the season, and so were many others. I never said, nor did any other reasonable people say, though, that he sucked and should not play. I thought maybe it would have made sense at some point to play Jackson or Grill ahead of him to build for the future if some of his woes continued, but that has not been the case. Nixon has been much better the past few weeks playing to his strengths.
Not that he was listening to us, but there was a reasonable criticism of his play that he needed to stop trying to create his own offense and let Haliburton or Bolton make it for him and just concentrate on being a bulldog. He has done that, and hence his defense has improved and his offensive efficiency has gone up. I am glad Nixon and Prohm identified that and shaped him up to defer on offense and maul on defense.
I loved playing Seton Hall again, especially so soon. It was physical, but not chippy. Refs really let them bang down low and the pace of the game reflected that.
I would also like to play a home and away in the same season with a good non-con team like Seton Hall. I know that won't happen, but I think it could be cool.
That was fun, but we essentially have nine versions of that in the Big 12 -- all the more reason a ten-team double round-robin is the absolute best format.
I
could see my way through to doing something like that with a neat opponent (e.g., a regional non-con rival like a Big Ten West team or Missouri) where both fan bases could maybe travel to each other, but you run the risk of having a lame match-up twice if the two teams were not on about the same level as each other.
The season could go anywhere, but the ingredients are there to not be sweating it out during the Big 12 Tourney for a bid. It's not a perfect roster, but Prohm did a great job having this program being more than competitive after losing 5 key contributors last year.
Haliburton - Figuring out how to be the super-star. He has a bigger load to carry than Niang or Monte, but the supporting cast is falling into place.
Bolton - Has the extra gear the team needs. Also knows how to play with Haliburton to make the team better.
Conditt - Can become that 3rd star, basically what we hoped Lard would be.
Young and Jacobsen - May not be exciting, but seem to accept their roles. On a given night, either one of them could be the x-factor the team needs.
Nixon - Best on ball defender since C Babb. It's been awhile since we've had someone that can effectively keep a 1 or 2 from getting exactly where they want to go. I think he is figuring out his role on offense.
I think most agree that ISU is better with Conditt on the floor, but I think his total minutes don't need to change a whole lot - he's going hard every minute he's out there, and that shouldn't change. If that means he's maxed out at 22 minutes or so, so be it. One thing none of these three have had before this year is the freedom to be aggressive and not worry about fouls. Last night when ISU was struggling in the first half Jacobsen kept us afloat with some key offensive rebounds and buckets, and Solo did the same to stop a couple Seton Hall runs in the second half.
I think the case is obvious the Conditt is our third-best or even our second-best player right now. That being said, I think total minutes and who plays at the end is more important than who formally starts, and, like you said, Conditt has a practical limit on the minutes he can play physically and because of fouls/his aggression on defense.
Prohm is toggling between Jacobson/Young, Jacobson/Conditt, and four-guard line-ups with Jacobson in the middle (as we did last year, and Jacobson has been his most productive when matched up 1v1 on the block with four guards around him this year, too) and then Conditt in the middle looking for lobs, swats, and altered shots.
Prohm seems to be getting the rotation down. Having three viable big men is a really nice luxury, and I forgot what it was like. We have been terrified of fouls and fatigue down there for so long because we only had 1-2 true posts you could play in the Big 12 that now we can see when you can tell those guys to go hard and be willing to physically challenge opponents at the rim and on the boards, who cares about a few fouls.
I will note, too, imagining the future, that we are going to have 40 minutes per night of a Conditt type with Foster coming into the program. That will be fun. You can tell them both to go hard as the 1 in a 4/1 for 20 minutes per game, rotate Solomon in there around them to give a two-big look, or play them together (if Foster can play as a 4 man, like Jacobson does an okay job doing) and have some frightening length on defense.