murderer and weapon found!

Gink

Well-Known Member
Apr 23, 2007
1,090
80
48
DUI does not matter. It can also occur with reckless driving. Leaving a scene probably helps bring the charge.

Chris Lillig

If anything, his fleeing will probably allow him to escape the vehicular homicide charge. No way to prove blood alcohol level at this point. He may well get a bunch of felonies thrown at him, but I don't see the vehicular homicide charge coming.
 
Last edited:

sweetwater

Member
Apr 10, 2006
135
7
18
"have i ever killed anyone?"

I'm glad you haven't.

But there is almost certainly a little luck involved in that fact. Most every driver has accidentally run a red light, accidentally turned the wrong way down a one way, accidentally done something that could have seriously injured or killed someone.

I would be stunned if you haven't too. By your logic, seems like that makes you an attempted murderer.
 

alarson

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 15, 2006
59,448
74,095
113
Ankeny
This case in Ames is similar to the one we are dealing with. Should give us an idea of what kind of charges are likely:
News Service: Iowa State University

wasnt she intoxicated as well? actually, if she hadnt been, she probably couldve gotten off in court. The victim was coming home from a party, walking along the shoulder (which very easily couldve been stumbling onto the roadway), on mortenson rd, which had no sidewalks at the time and was very poorly lit. Actually, its lucky more people werent hit through that area.. you never could see someone walking\biking along that road at night until you were right up on them.
 

jumbopackage

Well-Known Member
Sep 18, 2007
5,479
249
63
My guess is he will be charged with vehicular homicide. If he had not fled the scene he may have avoided the charge.

VEHICULAR HOMICIDE LAWS IN IOWA
An individual commits vehicular homicide when:
(1) Unintentionally causes death of another; by
(2) Operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated.
Penalties:
Mandatory 25 years imprisonment; Judge may not give probation or defer judgment. Prison sentence must be imposed. If convicted the Judge has no choice but to send you to prison. Furthermore bail is not available pending appeal or while awaiting sentencing.
Fine of up to $10,000 but not less than $1,000 plus 32% surcharge, court costs, $125 Law Enforcement Initiative Surcharge and $10 DARE surcharge;
Mandatory $150,000 restitution to victim's estate;
Substance abuse evaluation and treatment if recommended;
Drinking drivers course; and
Mandatory 6 year license suspension.
Vehicular Homicide can be charged in only two instances:
if the person was impaired (doesn't necessarily have to be above the limit, but must be impaired)

Or if the person was doing something very reckless (think street racing). Just a regular, sober hit and run wouldn't rise to that level.

Frankly, unless there is some very good evidence that he was drinking before this happened, Vehicular homicide is out of the question, IMO. Even charging him with it is pretty reckless on behalf of a prosecutor because it would such a tough case to prove, and if you don't win, he basically gets off scott-free.

My guess is that there will be as many charges as they can reasonably throw at him thrown at him, but one of those won't be vehicular homicide.
 

Spam

Well-Known Member
May 21, 2008
7,996
2,666
113
I started this thread on the side of those saying vehicular homicide charges were not likely. However, having done some homework and read the couple of cases linked, I'm almost inclined to believe that the initial charges are likely to include vehicular homicide (even if that is later reduced to a lesser charge in exchange for a guilty plea)
 

Gink

Well-Known Member
Apr 23, 2007
1,090
80
48
Vehicular homicide in IA requires either DUI or reckless driving (ie. speeding) or eluding the police.

The reports indicate he was speeding which will be viewed as reckless. Fleeing the scene and not turning himself in will not help his case.

I think they will charge him with vehicular homicide but they may charge him with less in exchange for a guilty plea.

Vehicular Homicide can be charged in only two instances:
if the person was impaired (doesn't necessarily have to be above the limit, but must be impaired)

Or if the person was doing something very reckless (think street racing). Just a regular, sober hit and run wouldn't rise to that level.
 
Last edited:

Angie

Tugboats and arson.
Staff member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 27, 2006
28,585
13,579
113
IA
Just remember, all bicyclists are holy and blameless, and giving them a dirty look should result in an immediate and summary execution on the side of the road.

Then you "might" satisfy the bicycle nazis.

I don't have a horse in this race, but the use of "Nazi" here (and elsewhere) is ridiculous. People are far too free with this rhetoric just because they want to villianize someone without providing any real evidence or a sound argument. It is rarely used (unless you're actually talking about Nazis) to do anything other than make an argument more volatile without providing anything tangible to it.

Also implying that all car drivers are murderers is equally offensive and ridiculous.

Please, everyone, dial back the rhetoric in this thread.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: DaddyMac

jmb

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Apr 12, 2006
20,987
10,519
113
I don't have a horse in this race, but the use of "Nazi" here (and elsewhere) is ridiculous. People are far too free with this rhetoric just because they want to villianize someone without providing any real evidence or a sound argument. It is rarely used (unless you're actually talking about Nazis) to do anything other than make an argument more volatile without providing anything tangible to it.

Also implying that all car drivers are murderers is equally offensive and ridiculous.

Please, everyone, dial back the rhetoric in this thread.
show us where in this thread that was said...
 

Angie

Tugboats and arson.
Staff member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 27, 2006
28,585
13,579
113
IA
It was obvious hyperbole. The point is to dial it back.
 

jmb

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Apr 12, 2006
20,987
10,519
113
It was obvious hyperbole. The point is to dial it back.
Angie, the point here is you are mixing hyperbole with the actual use of Nazi. You are making the arguement here less honest by swithching my position which is: Mark was murdered. I have never once said that all motorists are killers...and it is an unfair representation of my position.
 

Angie

Tugboats and arson.
Staff member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 27, 2006
28,585
13,579
113
IA
Angie, the point here is you are mixing hyperbole with the actual use of Nazi. You are making the arguement here less honest by swithching my position which is: Mark was murdered. I have never once said that all motorists are killers...and it is an unfair representation of my position.

As I mentioned in my previous post, I don't have an opinion on this argument (although the law's definition of murder differs from yours here). That isn't what my argument is about. This is a request formally to everyone to stop trying to just be argumentative with everyone else simply for the sake of being argumentative. There is a way to argue without calling names.
 

Cyclonepride

Thought Police
Staff member
Apr 11, 2006
98,796
62,318
113
55
A pineapple under the sea
www.oldschoolradical.com
based upon what?

the fact that the driver was speeding in an area known as high traffic for bicycles...is that what you find as accidental?

High traffic for bikes? Maybe so, but I've driven that road a ton, and only rarely see them, except near the bike path which is on the west side of Cumming. It wouldn't be the road that I would choose to ride on, because there are lots of little blind spots and small hills. Once again, I'm not casting blame on the victim (or absolving the perpetrator), but just saying that I can easily see how an accident would happen there.
 

CycloneErik

Well-Known Member
Jan 31, 2008
108,116
53,345
113
Jamerica
rememberingdoria.wordpress.com
As I mentioned in my previous post, I don't have an opinion on this argument (although the law's definition of murder differs from yours here). That isn't what my argument is about. This is a request formally to everyone to stop trying to just be argumentative with everyone else simply for the sake of being argumentative. There is a way to argue without calling names.

Can we argue about that last part?
 

jmb

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Apr 12, 2006
20,987
10,519
113
I think he does.

OK, so I let this thread die, but Angie brought it back up so here's the deal. I may seem like a "militant, nazi, eco-terrorist on a soapbox" but that's AOK with me, because I've done what I set out to do. What is that, you ask? Anytime the opportunity presents itself, my goal will always be to be to raise awareness of the need for caution when you are driving a car and come acorss a cyclist on ANY road. Yup, cyclists often do not follow the rules as they should when riding. And just to make it clear, I go after those bastards as well. I am just sick and freaking tired of my friends and acquaintances getting seriously injured and killed because people in this great state don't take cyclist safety seriously. Point made.

I take my responsibility VERY seriously as a driver and as a cyclist. I have raced, ridden and run all over the world, and the place that I feel least safe riding is right here in my home town. I will do what I can to change that. I hate that I feel so "exposed" and unsafe here, because otherwise I love living in Iowa. Again, point made.

Go Clones!
 

Angie

Tugboats and arson.
Staff member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 27, 2006
28,585
13,579
113
IA
(There was actually less than 13 hours between the last post and mine, and it was still in the top 10 New Posts on the front page at the time I responded.)
 

Latest posts

Help Support Us

Become a patron