The key part is that the wording of the rule is written based on control and not on possession.
https://twitter.com/The_Champs_Belt/status/250452490741493760/photo/1/large
Man what a touchdown catch by Tate, totally had joint possession while on the ground. Wanna argue that one?
Not really.https://twitter.com/The_Champs_Belt/status/250452490741493760/photo/1/large
Man what a touchdown catch by Tate, totally had joint possession while on the ground. Wanna argue that one?
Also that toaster takes terrible photos.
Stev young, john gruden, trent dilfer and basically every other person with nfl experience. Former nfl head ref and many more said iennings intercepted the ball. Yet some of you are still arguing that. Like you know mor than all of them. It was an interception.
Stev young, john gruden, trent dilfer and basically every other person with nfl experience. Former nfl head ref and many more said iennings intercepted the ball. Yet some of you are still arguing that. Like you know mor than all of them. It was an interception.
If you watch the replay... look at the eyes of the side judge who signaled TD (or in the direction he's looking) He is looking at the back judge. As the back judge starts to go up with his arms to signal a time out (which is the protocal for signaling an interception) He simultaniously raises his hands. (Thinking that's what the back judge was gonna rule) I'm also guessing that as Jenning came down with the ball... He probably thought G.B. was on offense, and that Aaron Rogers threw the ball. ...thus a completed catch in the endzone Clearly an injustice, but hey, in the grand scheme of things... it's just a game.