Nader will be the best player on the floor next year, no way he doesn't start. Honestly if we want our best lineup starting McKay should also be out there... The odd man out would have to be Hogue or maybe even as crazy as it sounds Niang... But it will likely come down to Hogue or McKay for that last spot even though Niang is easily the least talented of the group.
Think McDermott ever comes on these boards wondering where these threads were when he was coaching?
Nader will be the best player on the floor next year, no way he doesn't start. Honestly if we want our best lineup starting McKay should also be out there... The odd man out would have to be Hogue or maybe even as crazy as it sounds Niang... But it will likely come down to Hogue or McKay for that last spot even though Niang is easily the least talented of the group.
He's had 3 horrible games in a row, not sure what the hell you're watching.Kid has one terrible game and people start throwing him under the bus, he's won several games down the stretch for us this year with clutch basket after clutch basket.
[/B]
Literally Lol'd. McKay won't start, he'll play starter minutes but he won't start. You may be right, having the 4 guys wyou mentioned might be our best lineup but Fred has an NBA mentality. Just bc its your best lineup doesn't mean it has to be out there when the game starts. When a coach like Fred has 8 or 9 guys at his disposal, who starts is pretty meaningless bc he is going to get guys in when they need to be. Niang is the best returning known commodity we have and will be our only preseason all conference type of player, not to mention a 2 year starter.
I've seen McKay play in person a handful of times, with the way he plays, hes no threat o Georges.Niang will still be the only post up mismatch type of guy we have next year McKay will our best athlete and gives a highlight dunk a night but his game is much more like Hogue offensively than Niang.
The good thing is, McKay and Hogue played at Indian Hills, they are used to playing in a 10 man rotation and coming off the bench. Not starting won't bother either of these kids.
He's had 3 horrible games in a row, not sure what the hell you're watching.
Although most of them were about McDermott being fired.
Why do I keep hearing Nader may be the best player on the team. I saw him in the CCL and thought he was very good, but he didn't seem to stick out all that much from the others. With that said, I realize that league is more conducive for guards to showcase what they have. Anyway, are people hearing things about Nader from practice or is it one of those things where one person said and now everyone keeps repeating. Any insights on this or how good he really is?
He's had 3 horrible games in a row, not sure what the hell you're watching.
I never understood why we weren't in the running for Doug McDermot. Did he not like ISU? He doesn't want to play for his dad and then he does?
You know this how?
I think the Nader stuff is becoming similar to the way Chris Allen was viewed after Lutz said something to the effect that he was the most talented guard he had ever coached and all of a sudden people expected him to be an 18-20 ppg scorer. Allen didn't turn out to be the best player on that team.
Please elaborate on how going 7-12 from the field for 14 points, 5 rebounds and 3 assists (his OU game) is "horrible".
Some Cyclone "fans" are really really dumb.
If McKay gets his waiver that he probably will, he should be starting.