Must be a rough night in the Williams household. Seems like Chris’s kid hasn’t gone to sleep yet
I don’t think I have ever had this much anticipation for an up coming season than I do right now. I’m actually excited and have high hopes for this team. This is the first time I have ever had confidence in a team going into a season. Anyone else have this feeling that big things are going to happen this fall?
Cautiously optimistic. I can't forget that we had a lot of timely turnovers go our way just as the opponent was threatening to score: Oklahoma, TCU, Baylor. And then Memphis missed a field goal by about 2 or 3 feet that would have likely changed the outcome. We really lived on the edge last year. Are we enough better this year to NOT need those breaks again? I'm not sure. I am hoping we are. It would be nice to just flat out outplay other teams so that turnovers or referees don't decide the game.
I'm sure MLB is responsible for Front calls, and safeties responsible for coverage calls like is typical. I don't remember exactly how Campbell stated it in one of the recent pressers, but something along the lines of in their system they rely on a safety to be the quarterback of the defense. At the time he was commenting on Eisworth.I have a hard time believing that the MLB's dont make calls in the defense. Usually, you have a safety making back end calls but that doesn't take out the MLB's role.
We had a lot of things go our way for sure last year. But we had plenty go wrong too. Iowa, the horrible interception. Oklahoma State, Kansas State. Hell the ******* penalty against Texas and Park being a basket case.
Honestly, I think last year pretty much evened out.
We had a lot of things go our way for sure last year. But we had plenty go wrong too. Iowa, the horrible interception. Oklahoma State, Kansas State. Hell the ******* penalty against Texas and Park being a basket case.
Honestly, I think last year pretty much evened out.
They called him down on a reception in the WVU game where it looked like he could have broke free for big yardage.Butler dropped the pass in OT against Iowa. I forget what happened against WV, but I think there was a no call (or a PI call) that was really marginal toward the end that helped WV.
--- In addition to McDonald, another standout freshman defensive player that's been great during camp is Mike Rose, the linebacker out of Ohio.
So, is Mike Rose competing for this job good for this year? replacing Lanning was always going to be a challenge... the fact that a true freshmen is in the mix may be a bit of a warning sign.
When I saw the CF story on this, it was a bit concerning that Vance had not yet wrapped this up. I hope this is more a case where we have a group of guys that can be used based on various match ups..
But at least for now, it appears this will be one position that takes a bit of step back year to year. Not that the overall LB group can't be better vs last year (Spears improves, Harvey improves), but if you have a true freshmen in competition to place Lanning, hard to believe that is going to be an improvement this year (future could be in a great shape at this spot).
I think Rose being included in the mix says much more about him as a player to be excited about than it does as a whole position group.--- In addition to McDonald, another standout freshman defensive player that's been great during camp is Mike Rose, the linebacker out of Ohio.
So, is Mike Rose competing for this job good for this year? replacing Lanning was always going to be a challenge... the fact that a true freshmen is in the mix may be a bit of a warning sign.
When I saw the CF story on this, it was a bit concerning that Vance had not yet wrapped this up. I hope this is more a case where we have a group of guys that can be used based on various match ups..
But at least for now, it appears this will be one position that takes a bit of step back year to year. Not that the overall LB group can't be better vs last year (Spears improves, Harvey improves), but if you have a true freshmen in competition to place Lanning, hard to believe that is going to be an improvement this year (future could be in a great shape at this spot).
FFS people, did any of you watch the games last season? Lanning was fine for a former QB playing linebacker, but he was clearly our third-best LB. I know he received a lot of accolades, but that had more to do with publicity than play on the field. He wasn't bad, but he wasn't a star. I believe he graded out as one of the worst defenders on the team according to PFF. I would not be surprised at all to see an upgrade at MLB.
FFS people, did any of you watch the games last season? Lanning was fine for a former QB playing linebacker, but he was clearly our third-best LB. I know he received a lot of accolades, but that had more to do with publicity than play on the field. He wasn't bad, but he wasn't a star. I believe he graded out as one of the worst defenders on the team according to PFF. I would not be surprised at all to see an upgrade at MLB.
FFS people, did any of you watch the games last season? Lanning was fine for a former QB playing linebacker, but he was clearly our third-best LB. I know he received a lot of accolades, but that had more to do with publicity than play on the field. He wasn't bad, but he wasn't a star. I believe he graded out as one of the worst defenders on the team according to PFF. I would not be surprised at all to see an upgrade at MLB.
A straight up LB, sure, but he was typically consistently around the ball and a great utility-type of role--is there anyone like that for ISU this season? (not arguing, really just wondering)
He was vital in ISU beating OU as robber/spy and didn't let Mayfield get too comfortable.
Also TCU gashed ISU on a drive just running when Lanning went out with a stinger although that may have been Patterson knowing his football and going after the inexperienced area of the field.
It was a good example of Campbell putting his best athletes in positions to make plays which was refreshing.
Some stats for reference:
Tackles: Lanning 114, Harvey 76 (one fewer games), Spears 107
Sacks: Lanning 6, Harvey 4.5, Spears 1
TFL: L 11, H 12, S 8.5
INT: L 1, H 1, S 2
Passes Defended: L 2, H 5, S 3
Fumbles Recovered: L 1, H 1, S 0
Net - not saying Lanning was or is better than Harvey or Spears, they played different roles, you would expect a MLB to have more tackles, etc. but to I think his stats show he was productive, was around the ball, made plays and when he was not on the field it was noticeable... especially against the run..
Maybe I am wrong/over emphasizing it since he was a fan favorite, but I don't think we can assume you just drop a freshmen into the mix and replace him.
Even if we take step back at MLB, I expect overall LB (Harvey now a SR, Spears now a JR) we will be better... and Def overall, I expect to be better.. .just think this is a spot that at least starts out a bit behind last year..
I elated for the fact the we have something we haven't had in a long time....DEPTH!!