SJ looked just as bad.
He took a zone read 60 yards on his first or second play.
He looked bad, but not quite as bad. Barnett looked worse than he's looked in his whole time at ISU in the bowl game.
SJ looked a LOT worse than JB in the bowl game IMO. And JB was pretty bad. SJ was awful.
Both looked awful.
that and jeremy reeves for some reason in single man coverage on a 6'6" 230 lb wide reciever
Interesting. It seemed to me that JB was quicker, but SJ was simply more elusive. Wonder who is the fastest at various yardage intervals.
i hope jantz is healthy for the coming year. i think he started the season very well until he suffered his foot injury and was never healthy after that. jb did well after steele was injured and won 3 games for us. they both will get playing time this coming fall unless sam richardson beats them out.. it should be fierce competition between the 3 athletes...
+1, but JB is sneaky quick and a lot more athletic than I gave him credit for prior to the season (attempt at crow eating).
This may be the first time I've heard a non-white player described this way. I do agree though, he seems like he has a much quicker first step than SJ. Maybe thats due to being more confident in his decisions, especially on the zone read. JB is faster to the line of scrimmage but once Steele gets moving he's definitley faster.
It seemed to me JB wanted to run instead of pass, where as Steele tried buying as much time as he could and tried throwing before electing to take off.
I think the simpler playbook helps Jantz more. Barnetts biggest benefit was being in the system longer and knowing the playbook better. A better grasp of the playbook and likely improved mechanics and look out for Jantz.
I think this is a good point, IMO the staff gave Steele a much longer leash last year and it backfired. It was a totally different offense from a playcalling standpoint when JB took over, and as a result the offense had more of a rhythm. With JB the offense actually had an identity and something it could lean on, when Jantz was out there it looked like a pick up game a lot of the time. I don't blame Steele for that, I think simplifiying the playbook would have really helped him.
i hope jantz is healthy for the coming year. i think he started the season very well until he suffered his foot injury and was never healthy after that. jb did well after steele was injured and won 3 games for us. they both will get playing time this coming fall unless sam richardson beats them out.. it should be fierce competition between the 3 athletes...
SJ looked good before he was injured? What are you talking about?
On your first 4 throws of a football game, 3 of them get intercepted, that's not good in anyone's book. That is what SJ did BEFORE he was injured in the UConn game.
And then again in the bowl game, SJ threw some passes right to the Rutgers players with none of our guys anywhere near the ball. I mean it was just ridiculous how bad it was.
We will not be succesful unless either SJ or JB have become a LOT more consistent and accurate passers. We just won't. Unless Richardson passes them by and he is more consistent and accurate.
One of those passes right to a Rutgers guy was because Reynolds made a nice move and turned upfield. If Reynolds had stayed in his spot, it would have been a completion, albeit no first down. Reynolds made the right move. Jantz made a good throw, just the wrong one (if that makes sense).
All out blitzing ate our lunch.im going to make some illogical jumps to conclusions here, but i say we might have won the bowl game had JB completed that 3rd and short pass to a wide open Josh Lenz on the first (or second) drive of the game. We would have had it first and goal and likely would have punched it in and started the game ahead 10-0.
+ Momentum swing
+ Confidence
+ JB staying in for the whole game more probable