Golf trolls strike again - this time at LPGA Major

3TrueFans

Just a Happily Married Man
Sep 10, 2009
63,079
61,556
113
Ames
I would say no it isn't, however, the putt was 1 to 1&1/2 foot. To say an advantaged was gained, when there was noting glaring on the green for her to avoid is crazy, also if you think of a coin, moving the ball to either side of the original spot is moving you further from the hole. Provided you put your mark down like most people with the point of the mark pointed through the ball toward the hole.
I guess my question is then why did she do it? I know golf has a lot of minutiae in their rules and it'd be impossible to know them all, but I'd think one about moving a ball would be known by a pro such as herself. It's not like she picked up the ball to look at it and then went to put it back down. She picked it up and moved it over in the same motion.

But all that aside like I said before the real travesty is that they even allow this kind of complaint to be the basis for a penalty, and that the penalty is 4 ******* strokes. That's insane.
 

jbindm

Well-Known Member
Dec 2, 2010
13,073
7,605
113
Des Moines
I think the PGA and LPGA are playing with fire by more or less crowdsourcing the officiating and enforcing of their rules. If they want to change the results after the fact, that's their business. It's bad business IMHO, but whatever. But leaving it to Joe Fan to act as a spotter? They're opening a giant can of worms here.
 

cycopath25

Well-Known Member
Sep 8, 2006
5,948
1,231
113
(307)
I felt terrible for her. What a **** move by the TV viewer. Since when is the TV viewer a member of the rules committee?
 

boone7247

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Aug 15, 2011
3,014
940
113
Near the City
I guess my question is then why did she do it? I know golf has a lot of minutiae in their rules and it'd be impossible to know them all, but I'd think one about moving a ball would be known by a pro such as herself. It's not like she picked up the ball to look at it and then went to put it back down. She picked it up and moved it over in the same motion.

But all that aside like I said before the real travesty is that they even allow this kind of complaint to be the basis for a penalty, and that the penalty is 4 ******* strokes. That's insane.

The only thing I can think that happened and I have no proof to back this up. But this is a the way I can see this happening.

I always use a coin to mark my ball. I use the head on the coin as my "arrow." I point the arrow through the ball at the hole. I then pick my ball up and then place it back so it is in line with the arrow and cup. Maybe whatever she uses on the arrow, got rotated before she put the marker down. And when she replaced her ball, it was on her typical arrow. It was odd, but I just can't believe there was any intention to give herself a better lie there. there was nothing to be gained, even if say their was a ball mark in the way, the potential 2 stroke penalty is worse than missing the putt and putting the second. Let alone we are talking about a 12" to 18" putt. She can make that with her eyes closed with a ball mark in the way.
 

chuckd4735

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 29, 2006
29,494
11,863
113
41
Lee's Summit, MO
The problem isn't the TV viewer, it is the LPGA actually listening to the complaint. If they are going to do that then every shot by every player in every tournament needs to be televised and dissected.

This. If Im watching a football game, and I notice a hold in the first quarter that is missed, can I send an e-mail and have it enforced in the 4th quarter? No.

Its pretty simple...You have officials on the course; If they dont see it, it doesn't happen. Anonymous e-mails into the LPGA should be ignored.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: jbindm

Tre4ISU

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Dec 30, 2008
28,185
9,280
113
Estherville
Also, proposed rule changes would make this thing go away. It's been proposed that no outside viewer call or emails will be considered. That's how it should be. There are 2 other players and a rules official in any group. What they decide should be the final ruling.
 

Tre4ISU

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Dec 30, 2008
28,185
9,280
113
Estherville
It's not totally off the wall to say that moving a ball on the green an inch in either direction could potentially give an advantage though, right?

No, and I initially thought the ball was in a pitch mark but it doesn't look like that was the reason for moving it. The amount she moved it likely wasn't getting rid of something in the line of the putt either. The putt was so short, I have trouble finding reasoning for moving the ball purposely. That doesn't matter in terms of the rules but intent matters to me.
 

Cydwinder

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Jun 9, 2010
1,375
686
113
London, UK
Also, proposed rule changes would make this thing go away. It's been proposed that no outside viewer call or emails will be considered. That's how it should be. There are 2 other players and a rules official in any group. What they decide should be the final ruling.
I'm fine with an outside notification as long as it is a timely manner. If it is prior to the start of the next round (the whole round, not just the golfer, I would be fine with it. Mid-way through the back 9 is absolutely ridiculous though.
 

boone7247

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Aug 15, 2011
3,014
940
113
Near the City
I'm fine with an outside notification as long as it is a timely manner. If it is prior to the start of the next round (the whole round, not just the golfer, I would be fine with it. Mid-way through the back 9 is absolutely ridiculous though.

If you were to allow outside notification, it has to be before the player ends their round. On Sundays once the final player signs the card, the tournament is over.

That said outside notification is not needed. Also not fair since very few of the golfer are actually visible on the broadcast. Need a level playing field.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kcdc4isu

Tre4ISU

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Dec 30, 2008
28,185
9,280
113
Estherville
If you were to allow outside notification, it has to be before the player ends their round. On Sundays once the final player signs the card, the tournament is over.

That said outside notification is not needed. Also not fair since very few of the golfer are actually visible on the broadcast. Need a level playing field.

The one I always remember is Tiger at the Masters in 2013. He drops a couple yards farther away to get a little better number. How often do you think that has been done?
 

ArgentCy

Well-Known Member
Jan 13, 2010
20,403
11,146
113
I used to play a ton of golf but I don't even think I played a round last year. The rules are ridiculous some times and spurious. It's just not that much fun unless your playing around and drinking beer.
 

jbindm

Well-Known Member
Dec 2, 2010
13,073
7,605
113
Des Moines
I used to play a ton of golf but I don't even think I played a round last year. The rules are ridiculous some times and spurious. It's just not that much fun unless your playing around and drinking beer.

I've never played a round with anyone who follows all the rules to a T. That sounds ******* awful.
 

boone7247

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Aug 15, 2011
3,014
940
113
Near the City
The one I always remember is Tiger at the Masters in 2013. He drops a couple yards farther away to get a little better number. How often do you think that has been done?

Yeah that is probably the most high profile one before this. However, Tiger was gaining an advantage, just because it results in a longer shot doesn't mean it isn't an advantage. In this situation I have yet to see one myself or hear/see someone else explain the advantage gained. But as you are trying to point out, Tiger is the most watched player, and all his holes are on TV. Where Jason Dufner is only on TV if his hot wife is in the stands and he is in contention on Sunday. Yes I know they are divorced. But the playing field isn't level.

I guess you had the Dustin Johnson one from last year, when his ball rolled back, and he got a stoke because of it. Can't remember if that was a fan that called that or if the rules officials just went to the monitors on their own. Once again, what advantage was gained?

Hopefully in a couple of years this stuff won't matter. The new rules will help a ton for things like this.

Also if her playing partner or the rules official had caught it, they would have told her before she putted, which provided she hadn't picked up her mark she would have been able to replace the ball and no harm was done. Getting an email 20 hours later gives the player no recourse. How ****** would it be if it was her playing partner that caught it during the round, didn't say anything, then went and wrote the email.
 

NickTheGreat

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Jan 17, 2012
10,754
4,719
113
Central Iowa
I just don't like how this was done after the fact. What other "sport" can you retroactively change the results of something?
 

Latest posts

Help Support Us

Become a patron