Consistent with the theory that Leath's actions were the result of pressure from some out-of-line special interest.
I really wish people would stop Callin it a lapse in judgment. Having sex with an ex should not be considered a lapse in judgement. Short of that, nothing else is proven. In fact there is more info out there in Bubu's favor than against.Terrible thing for bubu if he did nothing wrong, horrible lapse in judgement regardless, but every human being is guilty of that, but how does he ever get a job now? Anybody can google him now and get a million horrible stories.
The situation is longer about Bubu. It's moved on to who has authority over their student athletes, the University or the courts. The Law of Unintended Consequences.
If Leath knew that (which would have been obvious at that point) there is no reason Leath is competent to lead Iowa State.
Yes, I went there.
I really wish people would stop Callin it a lapse in judgment. Having sex with an ex should not be considered a lapse in judgement. Short of that, nothing else is proven. In fact there is more info out there in Bubu's favor than against.
The situation is longer about Bubu. It's moved on to who has authority over their student athletes, the University or the courts. The Law of Unintended Consequences.
In my experience sex with an ex is always a serious lapse in judgment. :spinny:
Consistent with the theory that Leath's actions were the result of pressure from some out-of-line special interest.
The Ethos article is about the criminal case. The case involved the Student Code of Conduct is a totally different matter. There is a very long list of violations and a much lower threshold of evidence for guilt than in a criminal case. At this point, we don't even know what violations Leath found him guilty of. Maybe Leath threw him under the bus, but I doubt it. It is possible that Leath looked carefully at the evidence and thought that Bubu was indeed guilty. If so, then it would be unethical for him to have done anything else. I recognize this is speculation, but I think we at least owe Leath some benefit of the doubt until we know more facts.
You don't get it. There are so many people who are guilty of breaking the code of conduct that aren't even charged. Then there's the fact that even if he is guilty you have to find others guilty and you have to give him a similar punishment.
The other thing is why does the president say if you can be in athletics. That should be a question for Pollard not Leath.
while this is true Leath cannot blindly rule on any violation. He was ruling on an appeal of a charge of sexual misconduct in the form of sexual assault (read the ruling). He reversed the alj judge on the finding that it was unfounded. Sexual assault is what we are talking about, that is a known fact now.The Ethos article is about the criminal case. The case involved the Student Code of Conduct is a totally different matter. There is a very long list of violations and a much lower threshold of evidence for guilt than in a criminal case. At this point, we don't even know what violations Leath found him guilty of. Maybe Leath threw him under the bus, but I doubt it. It is possible that Leath looked carefully at the evidence and thought that Bubu was indeed guilty. If so, then it would be unethical for him to have done anything else. I recognize this is speculation, but I think we at least owe Leath some benefit of the doubt until we know more facts.
while this is true Leath cannot blindly rule on any violation. He was ruling on an appeal of a charge of sexual misconduct in the form of sexual assault (read the ruling). He reversed the alj judge on the finding that it was unfounded. Sexual assault is what we are talking about, that is a known fact now.