This argument I will never understand, you can request to see the evidence, can't you?
Can you ask the camera what happened immediately before the snapshot was taken?
This argument I will never understand, you can request to see the evidence, can't you?
Presumably you were speeding right before the snapshot was taken.Can you ask the camera what happened immediately before the snapshot was taken?
Presumably you were speeding right before the snapshot was taken.
Crash statistics are an easy statistic to find but is it the best? Calling it dangerous or not based solely on crash statistics doesn't really tell the whole picture IMO.
How do you figure? I'm failing to see how, so lay it out for me, if you would.The point is that context is important.
Over a huge sample size, odds are that it is the whole picture.
How do you figure? I'm failing to see how, so lay it out for me, if you would.
Can you ask the camera what happened immediately before the snapshot was taken?
That CA Supreme Court case I linked to concluded the camera is not the accuser.
Okay, so can the government official who signs the ticket tell you the context?
Can an officer running a radar in a speed trap tell the context?
Okay, so can the government official who signs the ticket tell you the context?
I don't know that either of those scenarios constitute an exception to the state speed limit law as it is written.Say you were speeding up to allow someone to merge, or to pass someone to avoid something further down in your lane. Or aliens. What if there were aliens?
@Cyclonepride do you agree it we have a speed limit law, should be enforced or not? If you agree we should enforce our traffic laws, shouldn't we do it using our latest technology?
Even the aliens!?I don't know that either of those scenarios constitute an exception to the state speed limit law as it is written.
I don't know that either of those scenarios constitute an exception to the state speed limit law as it is written.
Again, I see laws as being designed to create an orderly society (not a society of order) as we see fit. If we decide that a person should be present, that the offense should be specifically targeted, and accept that (oh the horror) some offenses may go unpunished under such a system, then we can do that (and I wholeheartedly support such a system).
Cities completely abandoned all pretense of safety in their arguments to keep this. It's about revenue, plain and simple. That was their main argument, because the safety argument would not have been borne out by the facts.