You'll be pleased when everything you do online is monitored under the same principles.
I only break 10-12k rules online so I should be good.
You'll be pleased when everything you do online is monitored under the same principles.
You’ll love the automated finesI only break 10-12k rules online so I should be good.
I'm thinking of one particular town of around 7k in North Central/Northeast Iowa that I frequently drive through which very recently put up 4 speed cameras. I can almost guarantee that there weren't any significant safety issues in the spots where the cameras are located and they won't have any significant affect on making those areas safer for other motorists or pedestrians. Off course the reason given that the cameras were needed was safety, but the honest answer would have been that they are there solely to increase revenue.
Or maybe the speed limit needs to be raised. I noticed recently while driving in California that their speed limits are a lot more aggressive. Places like 86th street in Johnston, which are set at 35, were 50mph in California. There were a couple times where I looked down and was going 5 mph under, which I don't think has happened in my lifetime in Iowa.But the fact that there are people worked up about this should tell you that this is an issue. If everyone is driving near the speed limit in these areas, then those cameras won’t generate a dime. Again, these cameras aren’t giving tickets for just a couple mph over the limit. You have to be traveling at least 12 over to get a ticket. That feels very much like a safety issue.
I always think this is such a stupid argument.Because those mother ******* finally know we have a right to travel given by the 4th amendment and reinforced by the Supreme Court!
The officers took an OATH!! They don't have jurisdiction over a living human!
You’ll love the automated fines
I always think this is such a stupid argument.
You have a right to travel, by horse, by train, by plain, by boat, by walking etc.
You just need a license to travel by driving a car on public roads, just like you dont have the right to fly an airplane, operate a train, etc without proper training and paperwork, etc.
Right to travel, is not the same as Right to operate, there is no right to operate, that is a privilege. Ones right to travel does not also supersede others rights either.
Similarly, people have the right to protest, but they do not have the right to impede others travel, ie block roads and walkways, and that right does not supersede others private property rights etc.
Make the speed limit whatever you want, people will still complain about getting speeding tickets.Or maybe the speed limit needs to be raised. I noticed recently while driving in California that their speed limits are a lot more aggressive. Places like 86th street in Johnston, which are set at 35, were 50mph in California. There were a couple times where I looked down and was going 5 mph under, which I don't think has happened in my lifetime in Iowa.
That's a theoryMake the speed limit whatever you want, people will still complain about getting speeding tickets.
Correct me if I'm wrong but, cameras can issue tickets for 1 mph over and fine you whatever they want, there is no law against it. Just because they don't currently doesn't mean they won't in the future.Simple way to beat these cameras.
Drive less than 10MPH over the limit, and use cruise.
Prairie City put them in to protect the kids, but not a lot of kids out there on 163, but sure are a lot of people traveling back and forth to Des Moines from the Southeast.I'm thinking of one particular town of around 7k in North Central/Northeast Iowa that I frequently drive through which very recently put up 4 speed cameras. I can almost guarantee that there weren't any significant safety issues in the spots where the cameras are located and they won't have any significant affect on making those areas safer for other motorists or pedestrians. Off course the reason given that the cameras were needed was safety, but the honest answer would have been that they are there solely to increase revenue.
Correct me if I'm wrong but, cameras can issue tickets for 1 mph over and fine you whatever they want, there is no law against it. Just because they don't currently doesn't mean they won't in the future.
PS SLOW DOWN!!!! I haven't had a moving violation camera or not in over 25 years.
I assume it was in jest too, at least I hope so.I was hopeful the previous poster was saying this in jest. But yes, once you are operating in a public space such as a road or in the air, you are subject to regulations to protect those around you.
Actually, even all those things you mention such as boats and trains also require the operator to possess a license. Even walking on a public sidewalk requires you to follow basic laws for your safety and those around you.
Yes, all people have to do is STOP SPEEDING.Correct me if I'm wrong but, cameras can issue tickets for 1 mph over and fine you whatever they want, there is no law against it. Just because they don't currently doesn't mean they won't in the future.
PS SLOW DOWN!!!! I haven't had a moving violation camera or not in over 25 years.
That's a theory
Correct me if I'm wrong but, cameras can issue tickets for 1 mph over and fine you whatever they want, there is no law against it. Just because they don't currently doesn't mean they won't in the future.
PS SLOW DOWN!!!! I haven't had a moving violation camera or not in over 25 years.
Then new law:I believe the new state laws actually do specify that limit now. I think I saw 11 mph over was the minimum, but most cities have set that threshold at 12. This is why CR didn’t have to stop their usage to be reviewed with the new law.
There are a boatload of those up in NE Iowa. The 2 Webster City are set up for pure money grabs just east of the exit on Hwy 20 and S of town on 17.The biggest money grab of them all are speed cameras set up in smaller towns of 15k or less that are placed in 30-40 mph speed zones. I don't believe for one second that those cameras were put up for safety because I seriously doubt that there have historically been significant safety issues around the areas where they are placed.
Damn it name the town, give us a chance to avoid them.I'm thinking of one particular town of around 7k in North Central/Northeast Iowa that I frequently drive through which very recently put up 4 speed cameras. I can almost guarantee that there weren't any significant safety issues in the spots where the cameras are located and they won't have any significant affect on making those areas safer for other motorists or pedestrians. Off course the reason given that the cameras were needed was safety, but the honest answer would have been that they are there solely to increase revenue.