Speed camera

CR used to place a couple cars strategically around the city to deter rush hour speeding, lik in the median by 30/380. That ended around 2010 or so I think.

IDK what they do now, but it sure isn't traffic enforcement. I think 15% of cars in CR don't have plates at all; apparently your registration fees are optional now. But never see anyone pulled over, ever, unless there's been a crash.
CR cameras take in over 7 million dollars per year.
 
The biggest money grab of them all are speed cameras set up in smaller towns of 15k or less that are placed in 30-40 mph speed zones. I don't believe for one second that those cameras were put up for safety because I seriously doubt that there have historically been significant safety issues around the areas where they are placed.
 
I drove 11mph past the speed cameras today and didn't crash.

The speed cameras on 235 have been turned off until the city can figure out how to make up some fake stats, to justify the millions they've made off these cameras.

"Des Moines issued 125,768 tickets in fiscal year 2023 and collected 84,991 fines. The city took in $3.6 million, which it spent on its public safety radio system, and the company running the cameras took in $1.9 million."
Great.
 
The biggest money grab of them all are speed cameras set up in smaller towns of 15k or less that are placed in 30-40 mph speed zones. I don't believe for one second that those cameras were put up for safety because I seriously doubt that there have historically been significant safety issues around the areas where they are placed.
I have seen a lot of little towns where the speed limit goes down to 45 or 40 then 30 through or on the edge of a little town and then goes right back up. There are a lot of travelers who don't slow down at all in those zones and keep trucking the 60-65 they are doing on the 55 mph highway or county road. A lot of those drivers know that the little town doesn't have a municipal police force and has to contract with the county for policing so there is a near zero chance that there will be any enforcement there.
 
I have seen a lot of little towns where the speed limit goes down to 45 or 40 then 30 through or on the edge of a little town and then goes right back up. There are a lot of travelers who don't slow down at all in those zones and keep trucking the 60-65 they are doing on the 55 mph highway or county road. A lot of those drivers know that the little town doesn't have a municipal police force and has to contract with the county for policing so there is a near zero chance that there will be any enforcement there.
Yeah, you don't want motorists driving 60 mph through town so in cases like that I could see cameras being installed as being for legit safety concerns. I guess I was talking more about towns in the 5k-15k population range that have stoplights, stop signs, city police patrolling town and enough traffic that motorists aren't flying through town at 60 mph. Placing a camera in a town like that in a 30 mph speed zone isn't about saving any lives.
 
I have seen a lot of little towns where the speed limit goes down to 45 or 40 then 30 through or on the edge of a little town and then goes right back up. There are a lot of travelers who don't slow down at all in those zones and keep trucking the 60-65 they are doing on the 55 mph highway or county road. A lot of those drivers know that the little town doesn't have a municipal police force and has to contract with the county for policing so there is a near zero chance that there will be any enforcement there.
Yeah I know when Strawberry Point put them up, a big reason was during the study they did before hand. In a 24 hr period, there were at least 30 cars who were traveling at 15+mph over the speed limit of 35mph where they have the cameras set up at. They have one full time officer last I knew for the town.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: VeloClone
Yeah, you don't want motorists driving 60 mph through town so in cases like that I could see cameras being installed as being for legit safety concerns. I guess I was talking more about towns in the 5k-15k population range that have stoplights, stop signs, city police patrolling town and enough traffic that motorists aren't flying through town at 60 mph. Placing a camera in a town like that in a 30 mph speed zone isn't about saving any lives.

Why does the size of town matter? If there’s a 30 mph road that goes through a town and people are going 42+ mph, that does seem like a safety concern. In fact, I’d say that 12 over in a 30 mph zone is a lot bigger deal than 12 over in a 55 mph zone.
 
Yeah I know when Strawberry Point put them up, a big reason was during the study they did before hand. In a 24 hr period, there were at least 30 cars who were traveling at 15+mph over the speed limit of 35mph where they have the cameras set up at. They have one full time officer last I knew for the town.
Are those on the south side of town on 13 or the west side on 3?
 
Why does the size of town matter? If there’s a 30 mph road that goes through a town and people are going 42+ mph, that does seem like a safety concern. In fact, I’d say that 12 over in a 30 mph zone is a lot bigger deal than 12 over in a 55 mph zone.
I'm thinking of one particular town of around 7k in North Central/Northeast Iowa that I frequently drive through which very recently put up 4 speed cameras. I can almost guarantee that there weren't any significant safety issues in the spots where the cameras are located and they won't have any significant affect on making those areas safer for other motorists or pedestrians. Off course the reason given that the cameras were needed was safety, but the honest answer would have been that they are there solely to increase revenue.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: 1SEIACLONE