Can we at least make ASU and Utah publically beg before allowing them in?
I don't want anyone at a reduced share. **** like that is why we got in this mess in the first place. Either add them as full members, or don't. I'd rather we don't add them.
Make Big 12 football the most fun, competitive league in the country on a week to week basis.So, what is BY's next move?
Make them take Greyhound buses to all away games.
I'm leaning that way too. I'm thinking UConn might actually be a better add for the long term vision of the B12 than ASU or Utah.I’ve been posting for a loooooong time that just CU/AZ and wait for ACC to crumble may be the optimal situation.
So, what is BY's next move?
Same here.Did I miss the AZ commitment and the ASU/UU begging? Or is it just presumed at this juncture. I'm certainly presuming, but in true ISU fashion won't sleep until something is on the dotted line.
None of us were worthy of picking... heheheeWe are damn lucky that none of the other conferences picked the Big 12 apart when it was weak. And they had 3 chances at it.
So, what is BY's next move?
Zero reason to slow ASU and Utah in right now. Incredibly slim chance, but let the ACC **** play out for a big. **** them.
Zero reason to slow ASU and Utah in right now. Incredibly slim chance, but let the ACC **** play out for a big. **** them.
It would be funny to get Utah and ASU on reduced shares but it doesn’t do anything for Iowa State. We get paid the same either way. It would be a slight competitive advantage over them in order to save ESPN and FOX a little money. I don’t care other than to just give them a middle finger. Probably not worth it.
If we were divvying up a pot of money, and giving them less meant we got more, that would be different.