Realignment Megathread (All The Moves)

I think our best hope is to be in the 3rd best “P” conference. Whether it’s the 5 + 11 or the 4-4-2-2 model or whatever, we will be duking it out for 1 of 2 CFP spots in perpetuity.

We probably have a better shot finishing Top 2 in a conference of peers vs trying to out “eye test” the top 4 of the SEC or B1G. Those leagues will game their schedules to make sure they’re never left out.
There are rumors of an SEC/BIG challenge type deal if both conferences are guaranteed 4 spots. Wonder what would happen to the Iowa game? Guessing they’d want out so they could play the Albany’s of the world to pad their win total.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MugNight
No current Big 12 school is going to the SEC or Big 10.

Both leagues have had opportunities to add every school and passed.
Not unlee (until?) the top 20 brands rapture out to the Premier League.

Then maybe they'd cherry pick from the ACC and B12. But at that point, why not just have 4 similar conferences or all band together to make a 50-ish team league and rationalize divisions based on geography, history, rivalry, etc.
 
Not unlee (until?) the top 20 brands rapture out to the Premier League.

Then maybe they'd cherry pick from the ACC and B12. But at that point, why not just have 4 similar conferences or all band together to make a 50-ish team league and rationalize divisions based on geography, history, rivalry, etc.
If the top 20 brands do their own thing, the remaining Big 10 and SEC schools will join up with us like you suggested.

Without those brands, there’s no reason for Big 12 and ACC schools to leave
 
It will make a difference in computerized rankings used by the CFP Committee given half of the SEC teams will now be guaranteed an extra conference loss. The ACC needs to do likewise.

The SEC (and ACC) playing another conference game levels the playing field with the Big10 & Big 12.

But I have a feeling the SEC is smart enough to make sure that extra game for the top 4-5 SEC schools in preseason rankings will be played against schools with preseason expectations to finish 10-16 in the SEC.

With 16 playoff teams there will definitely be 3 loss teams and I'd bet there are some years 4 loss teams get playoff bids. So that minimizes the risk of SEC & ACC schools adding a 9th conference game.

IMO what might be more important with a 16 game playoff is more non-conference games between P4 schools so their is a larger sample size of inter-conference games. Currently, Iowa States schedule is pretty typical with: 9 conference games, 1 non-con P4 game (Iowa) and 2 G5 or FCS games. In the future, maybe schedules need to be: 9 conference games, 2 non-con P4 games and 1 G5 or FCS game. Coaches wouldn't like it, but TV partners & Fans would.
 
It will make a difference in computerized rankings used by the CFP Committee given half of the SEC teams will now be guaranteed an extra conference loss. The ACC needs to do likewise.
Sure, I'll believe that story, another loss in the SEC just proves how amazingly tough the SEC is.:rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:
 
But I have a feeling the SEC is smart enough to make sure that extra game for the top 4-5 SEC schools in preseason rankings will be played against schools with preseason expectations to finish 10-16 in the SEC.
Conference schedules are set in advance for every 4 year cycle so I doubt they could manipulate it like that.
 
Your periodic reminder that the ACC literally can't play 9 league game because they've got 17 teams. The math is impossible. They're stuck until they either add or subtract a school.

ND makes 18. They don’t play a full ACC schedule, but as long as they also play an odd number, you can make the math work.
 
$200 fee at Minnesota to help pay the house settlement isn’t settling well with students on top of a 7.5% tuition hike. They are framing it as paying facilities. College athletic departments will need to tread very carefully how much they put paying athletes on other students.
 
$200 fee at Minnesota to help pay the house settlement isn’t settling well with students on top of a 7.5% tuition hike. They are framing it as paying facilities. College athletic departments will need to tread very carefully how much they put paying athletes on other students.
I find it crazy that any Big 10 or SEC school would feel the need to do this. According to the article 8 Big 10 schools are adding these fees. I guess it just goes to show that even with a lot more TV money the schools will find some way to waste it.
 
I find it crazy that any Big 10 or SEC school would feel the need to do this. According to the article 8 Big 10 schools are adding these fees. I guess it just goes to show that even with a lot more TV money the schools will find some way to waste it.
I know first hand Wisconsin is struggling to find ways to fund the settlement.

It’s not surprising to me at all. For any entity, when your entire budget is allocated, annually, regardless of how much the budget is, and you have to carve out 10-20% of your budget for an unexpected line item, you’re going to either a) have to make unexpected cuts b.) create a new (unpopular) revenue stream or c.) borrow.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Kinch
$200 fee at Minnesota to help pay the house settlement isn’t settling well with students on top of a 7.5% tuition hike. They are framing it as paying facilities. College athletic departments will need to tread very carefully how much they put paying athletes on other students.

A general question, how much of tuition goes toward academic facilities (separate from athletic-specific facilities)? I'm not certain if that works differently depending on institution.

I'm sure some students could be OK w/ extra $200 if they're into sports, follow teams closely, want success. Seems like it could be something a student could choose an opt-out. Maybe that opens other cans of worms with other fees.

Typing off the top of my head here.
 
$200 fee at Minnesota to help pay the house settlement isn’t settling well with students on top of a 7.5% tuition hike. They are framing it as paying facilities. College athletic departments will need to tread very carefully how much they put paying athletes on other students.
If the SCORE bill gets passed in Congress, any school earning over $50M/yr in media revenues cannot apply student fees to athletic funding.
 
I know first hand Wisconsin is struggling to find ways to fund the settlement.

It’s not surprising to me at all. For any entity, when your entire budget is allocated, annually, regardless of how much the budget is, and you have to carve out 10-20% of your budget for an unexpected line item, you’re going to either a) have to make unexpected cuts b.) create a new (unpopular) revenue stream or c.) borrow.
Will they cut the football coaches salary?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: NWICY
Will they cut the football coaches salary?
Coaching salaries and ludicrously luxurious facilities are where the waste is for most programs. However, those are nearly impossible to do anything about short term. Long term, you negotiate lower salaries, and do less/cheaper facility builds. But for right now, you are hosed. But if the media revenue is there, you would think borrowing against that would be the way to go. IDK.

We joked for years that salaries and facilities had gone totally nuts. Now is the reckoning.
 

Latest posts

Help Support Us

Become a patron