Realignment Megathread (All The Moves)

I don't want anyone at a reduced share. **** like that is why we got in this mess in the first place. Either add them as full members, or don't. I'd rather we don't add them.

Curious how we got into this mess?

The ones the Big 12 was paying more shares to are the ones that left. Not the other way around. ISU would have been happy to cash a reduced share in the Big 12. As should Utah and Az State with their current options.

Their bed is made. Big 12 controls the cards. Capitalize.

Its a business not a football conference.
 
Big Ten: Forms "alliance" with PAC 12 out of "concern" for SEC adding OU and UT
Big Ten: Stabs PAC 12 in the ******* back taking USC & UCLA
PAC 12: Starts to founder
Arizona: Considers leaving
Big Ten: "However, with the departures of Arizona, Arizona State and Colorado, the Big Ten saw the opportunity to add the Ducks and Huskies without paying them full media shares since the Pac-12 is in “disarray,” sources said."
 
Did I miss the AZ commitment and the ASU/UU begging? Or is it just presumed at this juncture. I'm certainly presuming, but in true ISU fashion won't sleep until something is on the dotted line.
 
It would be funny to get Utah and ASU on reduced shares but it doesn’t do anything for Iowa State. We get paid the same either way. It would be a slight competitive advantage over them in order to save ESPN and FOX a little money. I don’t care other than to just give them a middle finger. Probably not worth it.

If we were divvying up a pot of money, and giving them less meant we got more, that would be different.
 
Zero reason to slow ASU and Utah in right now. Incredibly slim chance, but let the ACC **** play out for a big. **** them.

Are the brands that are likely to remain after the SEC\B10 have their picking actually any better for the big 12 than ASU\Utah? And with B10 going to 18 (and likely 20-22 after ACC pickups), 16 won't be a ceiling anymore at that point
 
Iowa State Fan: “Just returning from a 2 week European vacation. Let’s open up social media and see how the cyclones are getting ready for the season”

.

“I thought this stuff only happens when Chris was on vacation”
 
  • Like
Reactions: exCYtable
It would be funny to get Utah and ASU on reduced shares but it doesn’t do anything for Iowa State. We get paid the same either way. It would be a slight competitive advantage over them in order to save ESPN and FOX a little money. I don’t care other than to just give them a middle finger. Probably not worth it.

If we were divvying up a pot of money, and giving them less meant we got more, that would be different.

The reasons reduced shares for them come up is due to the media partners being short on cash. It may be reduced shares or not at all.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Cloneon