Way too early football predictions?

troutslayer

Well-Known Member
Oct 28, 2011
836
758
93
Others on here have already said it, but everything goes through the OL and the DL. It doesn't matter who is at the skill positions if the OL doesn't protect and run block, or if the DL doesn't create pressure or plug some holes. There is talent on both, but some young guys are going to have to step up. I see this team going 7-5 or 6-6 just knowing how Campbell and staff are so good at developing and setting players up to be successful.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: cysmiley

JM4CY

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Aug 23, 2012
37,854
74,512
113
America
Now watch, Campbell finally gets over the CyHawk hump -- but we finish 4-8 or something.
giphy.gif
 

ISU4NH

Active Member
Aug 9, 2020
142
215
43
71
I have no idea. Been wrong ever since I've been an ISU fan, and that goes back to the Johnny Majors days.
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
Reactions: Tailg8er

BWRhasnoAC

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Apr 10, 2013
30,011
27,719
113
Dez Moy Nez
His stats weren't good but he did throw that long TD. Made the plays when needed and exposed a leaky secondary.

The 'make the play' was something ISU wasn't strong in for most of the season.
That's because Purdy didn't have the arm to beat the coverages. With Dekkers' arm, Hutchinson, Noel, Gaines, Porter, etc a solid O line and good running backs this offense could be better than last year IMO. They need to prove they can be clutch but on paper this offense is much more balanced.

Defense: Dline - some regression but not lower half of the league.
LB - small regression
Secondary: Better

This team has the talent, they just need to prove it.
 

OnlyCyclones

Well-Known Member
Feb 27, 2017
1,289
1,608
113
We lost our best QB ever, our second best RB ever, and two of our top TE’s ever. Not to mention the other side of the ball.

I think 6-6 is what I’ll predict, with an outside shot at 7 or 8 wins. But I won’t predict that. I wouldn’t be totally surprised with 5-7.
I agree with your prediction, but it’s fair to say that for QB and TE especially the bar to be the greatest ever wasn’t very high, at least statistically. I think Campbell has raised the bar. 7-5 is very possible. Last years team under-performed it’s talent/experience in the W-L column, we could see this team over-perform as a regression to the mean.
 

ISU4NH

Active Member
Aug 9, 2020
142
215
43
71
I'd guess you've been "right" at least occasionally during that span. :)Occasionally. I don't think I've ever been right about overall wins and losses for a season.
I'd guess you've been "right" at least occasionally during that span. :)
Thanks for the compliment. I guess I did predict the outcome of some individual games, but I can't recall I ever got it right for wins/losses for an entire season. Seems like there was a "fluke" win or a "fluke" loss that screwed up nearly everyone's predictions. I do recall that I got pretty close one year when Walden was coach (that was pretty easy) and missed it completely with Chizik.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cyclones500

cyclones500

Well-Known Member
Jan 29, 2010
38,737
26,742
113
Michigan
basslakebeacon.com
Because there’s a difference? Not really.

Follow-up - I apologize for the feistiness/volatility of my most-recent response -- I think we might be talking about slightly separate things -- point of my 1st post was in reference to discussion about chalking up UI as an L until proven otherwise, given recent inability; so I thought, what if '22 season overall was a step back overall, and that's when ISU happened to get it done (instead during a high-expectation like '21).
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Aclone