I can say for sure that the "masks required" policy at Menards now is not so much a requirement as it is a loose recommendation that is in no way being enforced.
It doesn't become a requirement until Monday
I can say for sure that the "masks required" policy at Menards now is not so much a requirement as it is a loose recommendation that is in no way being enforced.
It's Tyson not TysonsWhen is your first shift at the Tysons plant?
How many deaths are acceptable to you?
Is there a number of deaths we would hit where you'd be open to changing your mind and closing things back up again?
You are SO wrong on your thinking. NO! If we did nothing in March, it would make it a lot worse than it is now (it's bad enough now). I had already posted somewhere that action taken a couple weeks earlier would have resulted in thousands less getting infected. This has been stated by epidemiologists and other researchers. And no, it does not mean that people would get infected eventually. That's pure BS.Yes slowing it to the degree you want it to be slowed is what I mean. Doing what we did in March prevents nothing other than people getting it a few months later. Our measures we are taking to open up are fine by me so far.
And what about the 100M+ of us for whom the disease is very dangerous or it is for someone we live with / care for? We should just go ahead and die already?
The chances of having a vaccine by the end of the year is near 0%. The chances of having one by the end of next year are low.From isuno1fan:
"This...it is going to spread regardless. It just comes down to pace of spread and what risk level you are willing to take on".
You are very WRONG. See my post to awd4cy. According to this logic, then countries like Greece, South Korea, and quite a few others should have many thousands more cases by now. But they don't. Why? Because strong measures were taken immediately. When you add the fact that it is likely that more effective therapeutic drugs and eventually a vaccine (hopefully by the end of this year), many countries will never see the proportion of infections and especially deaths we see in the U.S., UK, Italy, Iran, etc., etc.
This is just an unanswerable ridiculous question...
I will counter with these questions...
How many people and businesses do you want to close and lose their jobs?
How many freedoms and Constitutional Rights do you want to destroy?
Does the number of deaths from starvation have to outpace the number of direct deaths attributable to the virus?
How about the number of deaths from missed doctors appointments? No cancer screenings, elective surgeries, heart screenings / EKG's, etc?
I can say for sure that the "masks required" policy at Menards now is not so much a requirement as it is a loose recommendation that is in no way being enforced.
You don't understand in the slightest how many people could die if we just open everything back up, including restaurants, stores, sporting events, etc without any treatment or vaccine available..... do you??
You're clueless buddy. We're talking millions.... but as long as it's not you, you aren't concerned, right? You feel like you're healthy and won't get it probably, am I right?
The 100,000+ that it is very dangerous for can stay at home. Staying in isolation though and slowing the spread doesn’t get us to normal quicker.
*our* fear. Fear of hundreds of thousand or millions of people dying because we didn’t take common sense measures. We’re all in this together - you don’t get to opt out of society.So does that mean that when people are unemployed, they can blame your fear?
Should we be concerned that you've forgotten so much about it?I can promise you I have forgotten more about herd immunity , virus spread , etc than you have ever known
*our* fear. Fear of hundreds of thousand or millions of people dying because we didn’t take common sense measures. We’re all in this together - you don’t get to opt out of society.
Should we be concerned that you've forgotten so much about it?
Jfc millions of people aren’t going to die. There is what 240000 deaths world wide with all signs of slowing down. That’s 240k out of 7.5 billion.
I know that chances are low to have a vaccine by the end of this year and that's why I used the word hopefully. However, we have companies that are working on a vaccine night and day. One is Moderna and early on it shows promise. The Oxford University vaccine trial is also promising. There are other companies and researchers working on one. I think the chances of getting a vaccine by the end of next year are very high in my opinion based on what I'm hearing from people in the know. Even Dr. Fauci said that a vaccine by the end of THIS year is possible if things go right.The chances of having a vaccine by the end of the year is near 0%. The chances of having one by the end of next year are low.
Its only slowing down because of the measures that have been taken worldwide. It will speed right back up again if morons get their way and we rush to reopen things because people go nuts over not getting a haircut.
I know that chances are low to have a vaccine by the end of this year and that's why I used the word hopefully. However, we have companies that are working on a vaccine night and day. One is Moderna and early on it shows promise. The Oxford University vaccine trial is also promising. There are other companies and researchers working on one. I think the chances of getting a vaccine by the end of next year are very high in my opinion based on what I'm hearing from people in the know. Even Dr. Fauci said that a vaccine by the end of THIS year is possible if things go right.
Jfc millions of people aren’t going to die. There is what 240000 deaths world wide with all signs of slowing down. That’s 240k out of 7.5 billion.