New Football Commit
- Thread starter pikecy10
- Start date
- Status
I hate to keep discussing In-State Rivals crap, but seriously-- when was the last time we had a conference game against anyone that wasn't on the FOX or ESPN networks?
Its a rivalry. You had people in your fanbase saying ridiculous things, and was calling them out. It happens on hawk boards all the time too. Hawk fans say dumb things, and clone fans call them out too. Its all fun an games, man
So you are asking me to prove they take partial qualifiers when they have no rules against it? And academic records are confidential? See below. Next.
I listed a player I know was not a full qualifier earlier. I am not going to say his name. This isn't about running down the players. This about lying about entrance requirements.
Fact: the big ten has no partial qualifier rule and they are on record saying they like giving those kids a chance. Again, not hard to search and find.
http://www.scout.com/college/rutgers/story/1474411-partial-qualifiers-adjusting-at-rutgers
So I come into this thread and land at this post. WTF is up with CF lately? Can't the mods direct the hawktards to ISR and ban those that refuse to stay there?
And this is why Hawk fans are complete tools.
Fact : if he is a full qualifier later, he qualifies for both schools
Fact: If he is a partial qualifier, Iowa can still take him no matter what.
BTW the player Iowa had playing dend wasn't offered by ISU. I wonder why.
Last edited:
Sorry.. I could have sworn Vance did receive an ISU offer, did not receive an Iowa offer, and academics were the main reason. I hope his academics get in order so that he can receive his ISU offer due to your rigorous academic standards.
1. So you have verification of this?
2. Yeah, ISU is the first school to ever offer a kid who hasn't qualified yet.
3. I am guessing every hs kid Iowa signed has not fully qualified yet. I will let you figure out why that's the case. Genius at work here.
Boy, I agree with you. I use the second-best method, I put all the hawk people on my ignore list. It's nice not seeing their remarks pop up.
I have no idea what you are talking about. Honestly I have seen nothing backing up what you said so I'm guessing you don't have a link and made it up.
Well so far you've come up with no names except for a couple Rutgers basketball guys which indicates it's a huge advantage. You're giving excuses for recruiting which may be relevant for one kid a year at best in an effort to be the littlest little brother you can be. It's ridiculous and it's something that does not matter. If it did, the Big Ten wouldn't have been awful for 8 years.
Translation... same dumb hawk fans. Gee, I can't believe Iowa has offered all these kids who haven't qualified.
I do get a good laugh out of you guys.
Partial qualifiers are not (were not) eligible to play as freshman. They lost a full year of eligibility. If the DEnd you are referring to is who I think you are referring to, he played as a true freshman. Undersized? Just finished his senior year as a starter? Currently 21 years old. Did not even red shirt.
- Status
