Let's talk about ISU logos that feature an actual Cyclone
- Thread starter Kagavi
- Start date
I alsolike the I-State logo. It's the most refined branding design in my lifetime as an ISU fan & alum.
There is zero requirement that it must be on the football helmet, by any means. (That's a different topic for another thread).
There's still an official twirly bird secondary logo that doesn't have any wording.
This is only one that uses Cy and makes sense to outsiders that we are the Cyclones.
Last edited:
Agreed. The secondary logos are really not nearly as significant as when we had Cy and a cyclone in our primary logo. I have grown very fond of our I-State logo. I hope we stick with it. As we get more national exposure (from basketball if not football also), I expect it to become better known outside our state.
P.S. I'm at Heathrow Airport getting ready to put on my I-State shirt for the return trip!
Just give me the old mid 70's classic helmet. Keep the chicken. We don't need a mascot..jpg)
I like this helmet a lot--really grew on me when we used it in that game vs. Iowa a few years back. But I like Cy. Cy isn't going anywhere. Sorry dude.
Don't kid yourself, those were epicWhile we're at it why don't we just bring back the Dog Bone Uniforms.
My understanding is the definition of Cyclone is basically any kind of rotating storm. Not just a tornado, could be a hurricane as well. I actually like the current I-State logo but I think it would be cool to superimpose it over the shape of a rotating hurricane (which I guess is sort of like what they did with the newer swirly Cy above.)
Unfortunately when I see a tornado associated with ISU it takes me back to those dark days of the 80s.
Unfortunately when I see a tornado associated with ISU it takes me back to those dark days of the 80s.
Well, I'm one and I can tell you the '84 tornado is the best logo we've had (ditch the text though). It's easily recognizable as the logo for the only D1 program named after a tornado. No text required. The solid nature of it makes it more flexible across color schemes; it's easily recognizable as cardinal on gold, gold on cardinal, white on cardinal, black on white, etc.
Iowa's tigerhawk is an excellent example of what a logo should be, symbolic and versatile. Now, understand me, I think it looks like a ****ing chicken head but as a logo it works quite well. Bill Snyder knew this which is why KSU ripped it off with the powercat.
Debate all you want about what looks cool but pros know the tornado is the best when it comes to branding.
We were nicknamed after a string of tornadoes that ripped across Iowa in the mid 1890's.
Bird in a blender is the worst one. Too 80s and too much going on.
I-State and Walking Cy are best.
I-State and Walking Cy are best.
And it looks way too much like Wisconsin's Bucky Badger, Pollard's influence gone awry?
The walking Cy, and the cyclone with Iowa State above it from the 80s are my favorites. I also think Cy leaning on the I spinning the basketball is fantastic.
I am in the camp that Cy needs to disappear from our branding. As a mascot fine, but branding is about image to the outside world, and to the outside world Cy is a Redbird, or a Cardinal, and that is not a Cyclone. Personally, I think it is a big fail not to come up with a logo of a cyclone since we are the only one. Plenty of stupid birds out there.
The whole "looks like Bucky" argument is ridiculous. I can (and have before) posted about a dozen examples of other mascots depicted in the exact same pose as the new walking Cy. It was not copied from Bucky. And besides, what else would you have Cy do, sit in a Lazy Boy, attempt to fly with his ridiculously small wings?
While Walking Cy is my favorite Iowa State logo, the Tornado from '84 is sweet. Both rock.
With that being said, the I-State logo MUST remain the MAIN Iowa State mark. (And it will.) It is traditional looking, it's sharp, and it is very recognizable. Living in KC, the I-State logo is noticed, and understood.
But there's nothing wrong with the Walking Cy (Our Mascot) or the Tornado (who we really are) Logos being the "secondary logos" IMO.
Last edited:
