Wow, I've seen some rationalization of your own behavior before, but this takes the cake.
Personally, I think they ought to give all the meth users, rapists, B&E artists, con men and mobsters a break until they round up all the murderers.![]()
Someone can't read.
I'm saying its a poor use of resources to lead a widespread law enforcement campaign against minor crimes when there are bigger problems. I suppose you feel that jay walking and murder deserve equal attention from law enforcement right? After all, a crime is a crime is a crime.
I was attacked for agreeing with another poster that in our home area, the police put a ton of effort into tracking down underage drinking. I never said that I shouldn't have got a ticket. I was caught breaking the law. That's fine. I do however think that there should be less energy placed on tracking down those crimes than others. Law enforcement can't be every where all the time. Why are we so concerned with minor crimes (and 17 year old kids getting drunk in a living room is a minor crime) at the expense of others? Is it because its easier to bust some kids for drinking than it is to track meth labs and take them out? You tell me.
I got another MIP while tailgating at an ISU game my freshman year. I was drinking a beer in full public view, and a cop came up and asked me for my ID. I didn't see anything silly/needless with that. There are 60,000 people all packed into a small area and you need law enforcement to keep an eye on that. He was making his rounds and had reasonable suspicion that I was breaking the law. So if you think I'm just justifying my breaking the law 8 years ago, think again. The moral superiority on this board is nauseating.
Last edited: