I thought for sure K-State would win this, even after going down 14-7, because vampire. Not good for the Big XII, but it makes me think this game is much more winnable for ISU now.
Me too. Thought it was a sure bet.The one time I bet on K state..
hmmmm...I like that! We deserve to beat those guys. They owe us for squeaking out so many improbable wins over us through the years.They have no playmakers on offense other than their quarterback.
Surly might not show up for awhile. While this game doesn't look good for the Big XII, I was okay with purple kitties going down. I'd venture to guess that, when KSU plays us, that Ertz and his receivers will be "unconscious" and will more than keep pace with our scoring - seems to be the vampire way.I can't wait to hear @surly give his take on this game.
He's going to give us trouble with his feet though. No team does that QB hesitation run better than ksuErtz was 10-28 throwing. Woof.
K state is even more one dimensional this year than usually. No stud WRs to bail out a QB that has no field vision.
I am surely surly is on his way to explain, I am seeing him post on other threads and he is always so quick to post on our site with KSU news.
He's going to give us trouble with his feet though. No team does that QB hesitation run better than ksu