Great game, but I can't say that I've ever seen an offense take a knee with so much time and timeouts just for a tie? I loved the call to go for 2 but really question not trying to get into fg position with 40 secs left. Thought is was vote of zero confidence in AA's ability to throw the ball. He couldn't run and can't throw...they kept him on the field too long today.
we had the ball, nebraska had pretty much of a zero chance to win the game. the only way we lose the game is if we royally screw up. taking it to OT gives nebraska multiple ways to win the game.
I thought it made sense to play for OT at that point, but of course I questioned it more after losing it in OT. But it's easy to think that way ... because of how the game ended. That brought up all sorts of second-guessing.
One was, why not just go for it all in regulation? But if we had a turnover, and NU won in regulation, we'd be second-gussing that.
If we were going to fake the PAT to go for two, why didn't we run a fake on that 55-yard FG? Well, if he had made it, we're up 3, and who knows?
I liked going for 2 after the TD, but I would have preferred going for it straight. But we could have missed that just as easily.
Had we gone for 1 and missed the XP, I would've thought, might as well have gone for the win — or run a fake, even if it failed(!)
If we had kicked it to play for 2nd OT, and lost there, I would've preferred playing for the win.
I replayed all that after the loss, wondering if any of those decisions were "good" or "bad." If ISU had won, every one of those choices would have been "brilliant" or "gutsy." Or both
Uh, I guess who were not paying attention when AA threw the pick 6. We were pretty much at the same exact yard line going into the wind.
He already had royally screwed up, why risk it again?
I'm not trying to add fuel to the fire, but why take a knee with 40 seconds left and all 3 timeouts left? I really dont care if you dont trust your QB. We really should have tryed to go score with all 3 timeouts left and some time on the clock...i think thats where we screwed up in the first place. I love CPR and the whole coaching staff, but that was a dumb mistake.
Nebraska has one of the best secondaries in college football. I had no issue with taking a knee. The only thing I might have done differently was run the ball. If you get a big gain then maybe pass. If you don't, let the clock run out.Great game, but I can't say that I've ever seen an offense take a knee with so much time and timeouts just for a tie? I loved the call to go for 2 but really question not trying to get into fg position with 40 secs left. Thought is was vote of zero confidence in AA's ability to throw the ball. He couldn't run and can't throw...they kept him on the field too long today.
It was the right call after I remembered how inconsistent our QB play has been all year....
there was no reason to not at least give it to a-rob and see if he could get something going
we were making fun of ferentz for doing this during the OSU game last year; i was disappointed rhoads didn't at least make an attempt at it... he usually isn't afraid of taking a risk
The hypocrisy of some people on this topic is shocking to me. The same people who are saying the fake XP was a great call because he was going for the win are the same people who are saying it was a good call to take a knee and go into OT. In my opinion it would have been much less risky to try for a FG at the end of the game instead of having a backup kicker throwing the ball with the game on the line. You can't praise the coach (and this is in no way a shot at CPR, he's a great coach) one minute for going for the win and turn around and say being overly conservative and not going for the win was the right call. It just doesn't add up.
Good point about Iowa vs OSU last year. I was outraged that Ferentz didn't even try, thought it was the worst call ever. I didn't have the same feeling about this situation, probably because Arnaud has shown a tendency to throw picks under pressure. I don't know.
I, too, thought Iowa lost that game by settling for OT. But a few things were different, in my opinion.
1. It was on the road and there was some momentum, and I think it's best to try to ride that out instead of letting the home team regroup and start from scratch.
2. I may be wrong, but I think Iowa had the ball in somewhat better field position — was it maybe their own 30 or 35? Getting into FG range in a calculated manner seemed more realistic and slightly less risky than starting at the 20.
I can't recall how much time was left or timeout situation in that one — seems like there may have been even more time.
The hypocrisy of some people on this topic is shocking to me. The same people who are saying the fake XP was a great call because he was going for the win are the same people who are saying it was a good call to take a knee and go into OT. In my opinion it would have been much less risky to try for a FG at the end of the game instead of having a backup kicker throwing the ball with the game on the line. You can't praise the coach (and this is in no way a shot at CPR, he's a great coach) one minute for going for the win and turn around and say being overly conservative and not going for the win was the right call. It just doesn't add up.
a 2 yard pass play, vs 60 yards in 40 secs with a QB who already threw a pick 6 inside his own 20.... hmmm.