Selby suspended 9 games

Clonehomer

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
26,172
24,029
113
I kinda wonder what the point of Kansas' revised amount. If the NCAA says that he needs to pay a certain amount because that's what came up in their investigation, isn't that what he has to pay? If Kansas feels that it is lower, shouldn't that have been discussed earlier? Otherwise, just be glad that he can play in conference games and shut your mouth.
 

cycfan1

Well-Known Member
Nov 27, 2006
4,896
2,275
113
Ames
Why is having teammates that take money more punishable than actually taking money?

What a joke.
 

Clonehomer

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
26,172
24,029
113
Why is having teammates that take money more punishable than actually taking money?

What a joke.

I think it has something to do with the exchange rate. Paying European players is a lot worse. Also, he went to Kansas. And we all know how much Kansas needs good players, I mean they're having to "give" tickets away to recruit's coaches.
 

cycfan1

Well-Known Member
Nov 27, 2006
4,896
2,275
113
Ames
I presume that the NCAA knew Lucca was a d-bag.

Haha. Regardless, there have been other players that have had to pay back money, and other Europeans that have had to sit out due to teammates.

Rule need to be more clear.
 

kucyclone

Well-Known Member
Jan 16, 2008
2,647
128
63
Seattle
I'm just as confused as you guys. The 9 games I understand; it's 30% of the games, which is about as bright-line of a rule as you'll get from the NCAA. But, as far as I've seen, there's been no explanation where the 5,757 dollars and 58 cents figure came from. And why is KU's figure $1,150 less, to the cent, than the NCAA's figure?

The NCAA is going to look pretty bad if they don't come out and explain all of this, in my opinion. Parrish, for one, has already jumped all over it - In Selby's case, reward clearly outweighs risk - NCAA Division I Mens Basketball - CBSSports.com

And, still, I haven't seen anything that, specifically, said what Josh did wrong. All I've heard is the vague term, "impermissible benefits." Perhaps that information is coming, but I would assume they would give a justification right away when telling a kid he has to miss 9 games and pay 6 grand.

I guess the Human Fund (Money for People) is about to get $5757.58 richer. Maybe Cecil Newton will give Josh a loan to pay it off.
 

A-town Cy

Well-Known Member
Aug 4, 2006
5,978
269
83
Huxley
I'm just as confused as you guys. The 9 games I understand; it's 30% of the games, which is about as bright-line of a rule as you'll get from the NCAA. But, as far as I've seen, there's been no explanation where the 5,757 dollars and 58 cents figure came from. And why is KU's figure $1,150 less, to the cent, than the NCAA's figure?

The NCAA is going to look pretty bad if they don't come out and explain all of this, in my opinion. Parrish, for one, has already jumped all over it - In Selby's case, reward clearly outweighs risk - NCAA Division I Mens Basketball - CBSSports.com

And, still, I haven't seen anything that, specifically, said what Josh did wrong. All I've heard is the vague term, "impermissible benefits." Perhaps that information is coming, but I would assume they would give a justification right away when telling a kid he has to miss 9 games and pay 6 grand.

I guess the Human Fund (Money for People) is about to get $5757.58 richer. Maybe Cecil Newton will give Josh a loan to pay it off.

That's how much KU has already covered for him.
 

thatguy

Well-Known Member
May 29, 2009
4,384
1,205
113
41
DENVER
Selby won't pay a dime of that fine. If this was any other school this would have been a year long suspension. Absolutely ridiculous.
 

cy2win

Active Member
May 15, 2006
585
49
28
Selby won't pay a dime of that fine. If this was any other school this would have been a year long suspension. Absolutely ridiculous.

Kansas' squeaky-clean program gives them the benefit of the doubt. :jimlad::jimlad: