Can we please move on to the next coaching staff. I will not be surprised if I hear one of the reasons to retain this coaching staff is because the team played well in the second half of the Baylor game and beat the spread.
Rhoads seems to barely be able to credit Lanning...
- Thread starter cyfanatic1968
- Start date
Can we please move on to the next coaching staff. I will not be surprised if I hear one of the reasons to retain this coaching staff is because the team played well in the second half of the Baylor game and beat the spread.
Especially when they come out and say things like our QB shouldn't be throwing the ball to our best WR who is 6'5" and can jump out of the gym when he is being single covered by a CB that is 5'10". That is just plain idiotic by any sane person.
That is the kind of arrogance I'm talking about here. Instead of saying.... "yes, it was a great throw by Lanning, and we definitely should have played him more that game, that was my bad" .... we get... "he probably shouldn't have thrown that ball, so that's why he didn't play again that game."
That is just plain stupidity, arrogance, and stubbornness. He cannot admit they made a bad decision.
None of these Incompetent Coaches DESERVE to be around after this Dismal Freaking Season
That would really highlight Rhoads' deficiencies. If Rhoads cannot win with Rhoads players, but a new staff can.
You have to wait until the results that the new coach has once he does get some of his own classes in for this narrative to come out.
That is an interesting question. Because Chizik wasn't winning when he left, but Rhoads came in and was winning, but people said it was because he had Chizik's players. I guess you could say that Rhoads was winning when Chizik's recruits were finally getting old enough to contribute?
But yeah, one could make the case if a new coach comes in next year and we go to a bowl game that it was Rhoads' players that got them there, however Rhoads wasn't able to win with those same players, so there is that.
Favre would have never been able to start at QB for Rhoads, no way. Made way too many dangerous and risky throws. Randall Cunningham too, when he was throwing bombs to Randy Moss. That would have gotten him benched.
Most coaches do not compliment an entire team or unit like Rhoads just did. Do I think it's that big of a deal? No, but it is kind of weird.
It's like me saying, the ISU basketball program was turned around because of the players, Fred wasn't making the shots, Fred wasn't draining those last second three pointers, Fred wasn't stealing the ball from the other team, but yeah, Fred coached well.
It just doesn't sound right, even though I complimented everybody.
Didn't he just bench a QB that some on this site have said has traits similar to Aaron Rogers?
Everyone reads into it what he wants to. People that hate Rhoads are going to ***** about those comments, although I contend that if he had said that it was all Lanning creating everything, the same people would have ******* because he didn't give the line or the receivers or the running backs credit.
I don't know. I get the complaints. But I guess I think he probably can't do anything right for some of the people on here.
