I bet Wiggins or Randle from KU gets newcomer of the big 12
Wiggins is a Freshmen, so he'll get freshmen of the year. And Randle plays for Kentucky.
I bet Wiggins or Randle from KU gets newcomer of the big 12
Pretty much a guarantee. Likely Wiggins.
Didn't realize that but that makes sense. Kane could definitely earn that this year.I'll take that bet, since newcomer of the year excludes rookies. only new players from juco's or transfers may apply. Hence the back to back to back comment. Royce, Cylburn, and Kane???
Do you really think Clyburn would have won it over Maclemore if rookies were eligible?
I bet Wiggins or Randle from KU gets newcomer of the big 12
I guess I don't understand the Percy didn't play well tonight thing. Seem to look decent to me.
As far as Naz I guess we will have to wait and see. I am sure he is improved from last year and will see a few minutes each game. Likely a 10 min a game guy. You might be right about Percy. We are definitely going to need him to play a decent roll with this team this year because we just aren't very deep in the front court.I don't think he played bad. I just think people are going to be disappointed if they think he will be a different player this year. If he did improve this offseason, I will happily eat crow but a game against a D2 opponent is hardly enough of a test to prove anything.
I also though don't understand the Naz hate. The guy was excellent with the ball and his defense looked great to me. He was off from outside and maybe never will be a great outside shooter but if a few more of those shots fell from outside, he would be the talk of the night. Thomas and Blufords defense looked the worse of the night imo.
But really no sense in focusing on any of the bad as they took care of business and ISU fans got a win they desperately needed.
As far as Naz I guess we will have to wait and see. I am sure he is improved from last year and will see a few minutes each game. Likely a 10 min a game guy.
No argument thereAs far as Naz I guess we will have to wait and see. I am sure he is improved from last year and will see a few minutes each game. Likely a 10 min a game guy. You might be right about Percy. We are definitely going to need him to play a decent roll with this team this year because we just aren't very deep in the front court.
Very well could be. 10 is probably the low end. I was thinking similar to Bubu minutes with maybe a few more.Try 15-20. Odds are he'll be one of the first two off the bench.
My bad I meant Selden or Wiggins from KU.
It was good to be back at Hilton!
One thing I took away from the game is that, right now, we have three really high quality players in Ejim, Niang, and Kane. I have seen many years where we only had one or two high quality players. To have three is pretty exciting.
Thomas and Morris both looked like nice players....hopefully they will be really good by the end of the year. I think both have very bright futures at ISU. Hogue looks like he is a nice player too. I love his aggressiveness on the boards.
CFH seems to have a lot of confidence in Naz, so hopefully he was just a little tight tonight. I do think he settled down as the game went on.
I have no idea how to rate the rest of them. I am not saying anything bad. I just think the top six players on this team are pretty evident right now. CFH obviously thinks Naz should be in that mix too. Still plenty of time for the others players to find their game/role.
I also thought it was fun to watch CFH during the first half. I am pretty sure he was not actively coaching. It seemed like he was just watching and throwing in players to experiment. I think he just wanted to see what he had. During halftime he started coaching and then it was over quickly.
It was good to be back at Hilton!
One thing I took away from the game is that, right now, we have three really high quality players in Ejim, Niang, and Kane. I have seen many years where we only had one or two high quality players. To have three is pretty exciting.
Thomas and Morris both looked like nice players....hopefully they will be really good by the end of the year. I think both have very bright futures at ISU. Hogue looks like he is a nice player too. I love his aggressiveness on the boards.
CFH seems to have a lot of confidence in Naz, so hopefully he was just a little tight tonight. I do think he settled down as the game went on.
I have no idea how to rate the rest of them. I am not saying anything bad. I just think the top six players on this team are pretty evident right now. CFH obviously thinks Naz should be in that mix too. Still plenty of time for the others players to find their game/role.
I also thought it was fun to watch CFH during the first half. I am pretty sure he was not actively coaching. It seemed like he was just watching and throwing in players to experiment. I think he just wanted to see what he had. During halftime he started coaching and then it was over quickly.
I didn't think effort was a problem at all. He had three rebounds and made a nice block. He made some nice post moves and had one bad shot. I would take that every time. We don't need him to be what you think he should be. We need him to be the best version of what he is. That means scoring in the post when there is an opportunity and taking up space while our starters get a rest.
Why do you expect him to have Hogue's style when we know he doesn't? That doesn't make sense to me.
Did you think Hoiberg was wrong in complimenting Percy's game tonight?
I guess you guys are right. I'll admit, I was a wrestler and don't know the finer points of the game.
It seems to me that I have seen other players that have had "the light come on" during their careers and improve their effort and game awareness. I must be mistaken though, so we should just let Percy make bad plays.
What the hell is this?
We are fans, we should cheer on the team and support the players. Scapegoating a player and ragging on his game in and game out is the worst aspect of a site like this, frankly it needs to stop ASAP.